* [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free()
@ 2025-09-03 14:59 Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2025-09-03 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux PM
Cc: LKML, Viresh Kumar, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Zihuan Zhang,
Srinivas Pandruvada
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable
in one statement when __free() is used.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
Zhang, I said the code structure here was intentional, but that was before
the cleanup.h recommendation was pointed out to me.
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -1502,9 +1502,7 @@ static void __intel_pstate_update_max_fr
static bool intel_pstate_update_max_freq(struct cpudata *cpudata)
{
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
-
- policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
if (!policy)
return false;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free()
2025-09-03 14:59 [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free() Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2025-09-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-09-03 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux PM
Cc: LKML, Viresh Kumar, Zihuan Zhang, Srinivas Pandruvada
On 03/09/2025 16:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable
> in one statement when __free() is used.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free()
2025-09-03 14:59 [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-09-04 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-09-04 4:32 ` Zihuan Zhang
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2025-09-04 4:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux PM, LKML, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Zihuan Zhang, Srinivas Pandruvada
On 03-09-25, 16:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable
> in one statement when __free() is used.
>
> No intentional functional impact.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Zhang, I said the code structure here was intentional, but that was before
> the cleanup.h recommendation was pointed out to me.
>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1502,9 +1502,7 @@ static void __intel_pstate_update_max_fr
>
> static bool intel_pstate_update_max_freq(struct cpudata *cpudata)
> {
> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
> -
> - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
> if (!policy)
> return false;
>
>
>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free()
2025-09-04 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2025-09-04 4:32 ` Zihuan Zhang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Zihuan Zhang @ 2025-09-04 4:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Viresh Kumar, Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux PM, LKML, Krzysztof Kozlowski, Srinivas Pandruvada
> On 03-09-25, 16:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>
>> Follow cleanup.h recommendations and define and assign a variable
>> in one statement when __free() is used.
>>
>> No intentional functional impact.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Zhang, I said the code structure here was intentional, but that was before
>> the cleanup.h recommendation was pointed out to me.
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
>> @@ -1502,9 +1502,7 @@ static void __intel_pstate_update_max_fr
>>
>> static bool intel_pstate_update_max_freq(struct cpudata *cpudata)
>> {
>> - struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy);
>> -
>> - policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
>> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy __free(put_cpufreq_policy) = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpudata->cpu);
>> if (!policy)
>> return false;
>>
Reviewed-by: Zihuan Zhang <zhangzihuan@kylinos.cn>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-04 4:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-03 14:59 [PATCH v1] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Rearrange variable declaration involving __free() Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-03 15:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-04 4:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2025-09-04 4:32 ` Zihuan Zhang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®