From: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <kangfenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Fix disk not being scanned in after being removed
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:42:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e95993da-db88-5db2-0aa8-f0c7589ce902@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d132b63-7336-4f59-a5f0-5ec37c3c34d3@oracle.com>
Hi John,
On 2024/2/27 17:06, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2024 07:16, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we directly set phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_PHY_DISABLED
>>>> here? For an empty PHY the other variables means nothing, so why
>>>> bother get and update them?
>>> The value of the negotiated link rate has two possible values in
>>> the current processing branch: SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN and
>>> SAS_PHY_DISABLED, and both come from disc_resp. If we do not use
>>> disc_resp, but set a fixed value SAS_PHY_DISABLED for it, it may not
>>> be appropriate.
>
> But we know that the phy is disabled, right? It's our phy, isn't it?
Yes, just like the previous submission, if we disable phy ourselves
through the sysfs node, we can configure the negotiation rate to
SAS_PHY_DISABLED by setting phy->phy->enable to 0. It might be better to
use sas_set_ex_phy() as you described before, it will refresh other phy
information synchronously, such as sas_address, device_type,
target_protocols, etc. If we only update the negotiation rate and
maintain the old information, is it because it is special? Is it better
to update phy information uniformly?
Thanks,
Xingui
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-27 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-21 7:31 Xingui Yang
2024-02-22 12:41 ` John Garry
2024-02-23 4:04 ` yangxingui
2024-02-23 7:04 ` Jason Yan
2024-02-27 3:06 ` yangxingui
2024-02-27 7:16 ` Jason Yan
2024-02-27 9:06 ` John Garry
2024-02-27 9:42 ` yangxingui [this message]
2024-02-28 13:13 ` yangxingui
2024-02-28 16:26 ` John Garry
2024-02-28 18:13 ` John Garry
2024-03-01 1:55 ` Jason Yan
2024-03-04 12:50 ` yangxingui
2024-03-05 2:56 ` Jason Yan
2024-03-05 10:15 ` John Garry
2024-03-05 11:25 ` yangxingui
2024-03-06 17:57 ` John Garry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e95993da-db88-5db2-0aa8-f0c7589ce902@huawei.com \
--to=yangxingui@huawei.com \
--cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
--cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®