mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: yangxingui <yangxingui@huawei.com>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>, <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	<chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>, <kangfenglong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: libsas: Fix disk not being scanned in after being removed
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:42:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e95993da-db88-5db2-0aa8-f0c7589ce902@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7d132b63-7336-4f59-a5f0-5ec37c3c34d3@oracle.com>

Hi John,

On 2024/2/27 17:06, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/02/2024 07:16, Jason Yan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we directly set phy->negotiated_linkrate = SAS_PHY_DISABLED 
>>>> here? For an empty PHY the other variables means nothing, so why 
>>>> bother get and update them?
>>> The value of the negotiated link rate has two possible values ​​in 
>>> the current processing branch: SAS_LINK_RATE_UNKNOWN and 
>>> SAS_PHY_DISABLED, and both come from disc_resp. If we do not use 
>>> disc_resp, but set a fixed value SAS_PHY_DISABLED for it, it may not 
>>> be appropriate.
> 
> But we know that the phy is disabled, right? It's our phy, isn't it?
Yes, just like the previous submission, if we disable phy ourselves 
through the sysfs node, we can configure the negotiation rate to 
SAS_PHY_DISABLED by setting phy->phy->enable to 0. It might be better to 
use sas_set_ex_phy() as you described before, it will refresh other phy 
information synchronously, such as sas_address, device_type, 
target_protocols, etc. If we only update the negotiation rate and 
maintain the old information, is it because it is special? Is it better 
to update phy information uniformly?

Thanks,
Xingui

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-27  9:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21  7:31 Xingui Yang
2024-02-22 12:41 ` John Garry
2024-02-23  4:04   ` yangxingui
2024-02-23  7:04     ` Jason Yan
2024-02-27  3:06       ` yangxingui
2024-02-27  7:16         ` Jason Yan
2024-02-27  9:06           ` John Garry
2024-02-27  9:42             ` yangxingui [this message]
2024-02-28 13:13   ` yangxingui
2024-02-28 16:26     ` John Garry
2024-02-28 18:13 ` John Garry
2024-03-01  1:55   ` Jason Yan
2024-03-04 12:50     ` yangxingui
2024-03-05  2:56       ` Jason Yan
2024-03-05 10:15         ` John Garry
2024-03-05 11:25           ` yangxingui
2024-03-06 17:57             ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e95993da-db88-5db2-0aa8-f0c7589ce902@huawei.com \
    --to=yangxingui@huawei.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=kangfenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®