From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "Ilya Yanok" <yanok@emcraft.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wd@denx.de, yur@emcraft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASYNC_TX: fix the bug in async_tx_run_dependencies
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 16:24:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20809041624o24af57fsbe58507a44e6e2ef@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080904141945.f5c4c3eb.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 01:43:51 +0400
> Ilya Yanok <yanok@emcraft.com> wrote:
>
>> From: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
>>
>> Should clear the next pointer of the TX if we are sure that the
>> next TX (say NXT) will be submitted to the channel too. Overwise,
>> we break the chain of descriptors, because we lose the information
>> about the next descriptor to run. So next time, when invoke
>> async_tx_run_dependencies() with TX, it's TX->next will be NULL, and
>> NXT will be never submitted.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov <yur@emcraft.com>
>
> This patch should include your signed-off-by: as well. Because you
> were on the delivery path, as described in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
>
Yes, Ilya once I have your signed-off-by I will push this to Linus and
-stable. As far as impact for in-tree drivers: iop13xx by is immune,
iop3xx can hit this, and it looks like the orion5x implementation is
immune since copy and xor are available on the same channel.
--
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-04 23:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 21:43 Ilya Yanok
2008-09-04 21:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-09-04 23:24 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2008-09-05 0:03 ` Dan Williams
2008-09-05 10:17 ` Ilya Yanok
2008-09-05 9:15 ` Ilya Yanok
2008-09-05 13:06 ` Wolfgang Denk
2008-09-05 13:16 ` Ilya Yanok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9c3a7c20809041624o24af57fsbe58507a44e6e2ef@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
--cc=yanok@emcraft.com \
--cc=yur@emcraft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®