Re: [PATCH 1/6] wifi: ath10k: sdio: simplify module initialization

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 03/04/2024 15:50, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com> writes:
> 
>> On 3/29/2024 10:10 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> This driver's initialization functions do not perform any custom code,
>>> except printing messages.  Printing messages on modules
>>> loading/unloading is discouraged because it pollutes the dmesg
>>> regardless whether user actually has this device.  Core kernel code
>>> already gives tools to investigate whether module was loaded or not.
>>>
>>> Drop the printing messages which allows to replace open-coded
>>> module_sdio_driver().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> FYI:
>>> I have ongoing patchset touching few lines above this patch chunk
>>> (sdio_driver) which might go via different tree. If that patchset is
>>> applied via different tree, it might result in a trivial conflict, but
>>> there is no dependency. They can go via separate trees (except that
>>> trivial conflict).
>>
>> I'll let Kalle respond if he'll take this through the ath tree vs letting you
>> take it through your tree
> 
> I prefer to avoid conflicts as much as possible. In this patchset I'm
> not anticipating any conflicts with wireless trees, so if we can avoid
> any conflicts, please take this patchset via the other tree:
> 
> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
> 
> I'll drop this patchset from my queue. But if I should take these to
> wireless trees instead just let me know.

Just to clarify - only the first patch has possible conflict. The rest
should be fine. Can you pick up 2-6 patches from this set?

Best regards,
Krzysztof