From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
To: "Thomas Weißschuh" <linux@weissschuh.net>,
"Masahiro Yamada" <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
MPTCP Linux <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kbuild: make all file references relative to source root
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:12:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edc50aa7-0740-4942-8c15-96f12f2acc7e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250315-kbuild-prefix-map-v2-1-00e1983b2a23@weissschuh.net>
Hi Thomas, Masahiro,
+Cc Peter Oberparleiter, MPTCP ML
On 15/03/2025 14:20, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> -fmacro-prefix-map only affects __FILE__ and __BASE_FILE__.
> Other references, for example in debug information, are not affected.
> This makes handling of file references in the compiler outputs harder to
> use and creates problems for reproducible builds.
>
> Switch to -ffile-prefix map which affects all references.
>
> Also drop the documentation section advising manual specification of
> -fdebug-prefix-map for reproducible builds, as it is not necessary
> anymore.
>
> Suggested-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/c49cc967294f9a3a4a34f69b6a8727a6d3959ed8.camel@decadent.org.uk/
> Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> # arch/x86/
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
Thank you for having worked on that!
(...)
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 5c333682dc9142b1aacfe454a5c77f5923554b7d..4f920187cee658ae4d1b807fca365f6994274828 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ endif
>
> # change __FILE__ to the relative path to the source directory
> ifdef building_out_of_srctree
> -KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-fmacro-prefix-map=$(srcroot)/=)
> +KBUILD_CPPFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-ffile-prefix-map=$(srcroot)/=)
> KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS += --remap-path-prefix=$(srcroot)/=
> endif
Today, I noticed that my CI for the MPTCP subsystem couldn't produce
code coverage files like before: the source files are not found. A 'git
bisect' pointed me to this patch. Reverting it seems to fix the issue.
My CI is building the kernel out of the source tree, in ".virtme/build".
Before and after this patch, GCOV seems to do its job properly.
Capturing GCOV data with this lcov command seems OK too:
lcov --capture --keep-going -j "${INPUT_CPUS}" \
--rc geninfo_unexecuted_blocks=1 \
--include '/net/mptcp/' \
--function-coverage --branch-coverage \
-b "${PWD}/.virtme/build" -o kernel.lcov
But after this patch, lcov complains some files are not found, e.g.
ERROR: (source) unable to open
${WORKDIR}/.virtme/build/net/mptcp/ctrl.c: No such file or directory
The output file is different: the path to the source file is wrong
because it points to the build dir. Instead of ...
SF:${WORKDIR}/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
... now I have ...
SF:${WORKDIR}/.virtme/build/net/mptcp/ctrl.c
Are there modifications needed on GCOV side to adapt to the behaviour
change introduced by this patch? Or something else needed on the
userspace side?
Cheers,
Matt
--
Sponsored by the NGI0 Core fund.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-15 13:20 Thomas Weißschuh
2025-03-16 2:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2025-03-16 19:08 ` Ben Hutchings
2025-03-17 17:17 ` Nathan Chancellor
2025-04-29 16:12 ` Matthieu Baerts [this message]
2025-05-01 16:48 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-05-02 11:33 ` Peter Oberparleiter
2025-04-29 19:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-05-05 7:30 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-05-11 3:37 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edc50aa7-0740-4942-8c15-96f12f2acc7e@kernel.org \
--to=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@weissschuh.net \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®