From: "Gupta, Akshay" <Akshay.Gupta@amd.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, arnd@arndb.de, linux@roeck-us.net,
Anand.Umarji@amd.com,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] dt-bindings: misc: Add binding document for SB-RMI I3C
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2025 17:25:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eec28fe2-6722-496a-9256-2da2559fb18a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c09da948-6e31-454d-acca-99c226c18c61@kernel.org>
On 7/29/2025 12:01 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On 28/07/2025 08:10, Akshay Gupta wrote:
>> - Document the dt-binding for AMD SB-RMI
> Why every commit is a one-item list?
Ack, will add more information related to changes
>
>> Reviewed-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <naveenkrishna.chatradhi@amd.com>
> I don't believe these reviews. Code was obviously buggy, but still reviewed.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Gupta <akshay.gupta@amd.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml | 56 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml
> Your previous patches make no sense with this...
This will push with I3C driver changes
>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1d19571c2095
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/amd,sbrmi-i3c.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: >
> From where did you take such syntax of title?
Ack, will update.
>
>> + Sideband Remote Management Interface (SB-RMI) compliant
>> + AMD SoC.
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Akshay Gupta <Akshay.Gupta@amd.com>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + SB Remote Management Interface (SB-RMI) is an SMBus compatible
>> + interface that reports AMD SoC's Power (normalized Power) using,
>> + Mailbox Service Request over I3C interface to BMC.
>> + The power attributes in hwmon reports power in microwatts.
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + reg:
>> + - description: |
>> + Encodes the static I2C address.
>> + Socket 0: 0x3c
>> + Socket 1: 0x38
>> + - description: |
>> + First half of the Provisioned ID (following the PID
>> + definition provided by the I3C specification).
>> + Contains the manufacturer ID left-shifted by 1 (0x224).
>> + - description: |
>> + Second half of the Provisioned ID (following the PID
>> + definition provided by the I3C specification).
>> + Contains the ORing of the part ID left-shifted by 16,
>> + the instance ID left-shifted by 12 and extra information (0x00000002).
>> +
> And this entire patch is just noop. Makes no difference, makes no impact.
>
> Drop it and write proper bindings with proper description of problem you
> are solving.
Ack, will modify the content as mentioned.
>
> <form letter>
> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
> your patches on recent Linux kernel.
>
> Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
> people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
> ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel
> (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be
> fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new
> patches to the patchset.
>
> You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
> tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
> a waste of time.
>
> Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.
> </form letter>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-11 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-28 6:10 [PATCH v1 1/5] misc: amd-sbi: Split core driver as separate module Akshay Gupta
2025-07-28 6:10 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: amd-sbi: Add support for SB-RMI over I3C Akshay Gupta
2025-07-28 6:37 ` Thomas Weißschuh
2025-08-11 11:02 ` Gupta, Akshay
2025-07-29 6:33 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-11 11:03 ` Gupta, Akshay
2025-07-28 6:10 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] dt-bindings: misc: Move amd,sbrmi.yaml from hwmon to misc Akshay Gupta
2025-07-29 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-11 11:54 ` Gupta, Akshay
2025-08-11 11:56 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-28 6:10 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] dt-bindings: misc: Update the "$id:" to misc path Akshay Gupta
2025-07-29 6:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-07-28 6:10 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] dt-bindings: misc: Add binding document for SB-RMI I3C Akshay Gupta
2025-07-29 6:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-08-11 11:55 ` Gupta, Akshay [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eec28fe2-6722-496a-9256-2da2559fb18a@amd.com \
--to=akshay.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=Anand.Umarji@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=naveenkrishna.chatradhi@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®