From: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Fail the kernel build on fatal errors
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 07:51:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <efa81d0d-5e26-a3e4-a8d5-ec0d3f6499ee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f18c3743de0fef673d49dd35760f26bdef7f6fc3.1581359535.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>
On 2/10/20 6:32 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> When objtool encounters a fatal error, it usually means the binary is
> corrupt or otherwise broken in some way. Up until now, such errors were
> just treated as warnings which didn't fail the kernel build.
>
> However, objtool is now stable enough that if a fatal error is
> discovered, it most likely means something is seriously wrong and it
> should fail the kernel build.
>
> Note that this doesn't apply to "normal" objtool warnings; only fatal
> ones.
>
> Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/objtool/check.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/objtool/check.c b/tools/objtool/check.c
> index b6da413bcbd6..61d2d1877fd2 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
> @@ -2509,8 +2509,14 @@ int check(const char *_objname, bool orc)
> out:
> cleanup(&file);
>
> - /* ignore warnings for now until we get all the code cleaned up */
> - if (ret || warnings)
> - return 0;
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /*
> + * Fatal error. The binary is corrupt or otherwise broken in
> + * some way, or objtool itself is broken. Fail the kernel
> + * build.
> + */
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Julien Thierry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-10 18:32 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: Relocation sanity check for alternatives Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-10 18:32 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: Fail the kernel build on fatal errors Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-11 7:51 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2020-02-11 12:47 ` [tip: core/objtool] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-13 22:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-14 0:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 17:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-19 22:43 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-02-20 0:44 ` Philip Li
2020-02-20 19:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-02-10 18:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool: Add is_static_jump() helper Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-11 7:52 ` Julien Thierry
2020-02-11 12:47 ` [tip: core/objtool] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-10 18:32 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Add relocation check for alternative sections Josh Poimboeuf
2020-02-11 1:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-02-11 8:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-02-11 8:16 ` Julien Thierry
2020-02-11 12:47 ` [tip: core/objtool] " tip-bot2 for Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=efa81d0d-5e26-a3e4-a8d5-ec0d3f6499ee@redhat.com \
--to=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®