From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: Huang Shijie <huangsj@hygon.cn>
Cc: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <acme@kernel.org>,
<namhyung@kernel.org>, <zhongyuan@hygon.cn>,
<fangbaoshun@hygon.cn>, <yingzhiwei@hygon.cn>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
<jolsa@kernel.org>, <irogers@google.com>,
<adrian.hunter@intel.com>, <james.clark@linaro.org>,
<tglx@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>,
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <liuqi@hygon.cn>,
<lijing@hygon.cn>, <wangfengyu@hygon.cn>, <wujianyong@hygon.cn>,
<shijie8@gmail.com>, <1537577747@qq.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/amd/ibs: add phy_addr_only software filter for ibs_op
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 09:45:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f151155a-54c1-41b1-8905-2347a1404001@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <auMrUXp42Djz3zu9@hsj-2U-Workstation>
Huang,
>> Can you please confirm if those additional samples are genuinely valid.
>
> Yes.
> To answer this properly I re-ran the mysql test,
> and verified the physical address of every captured sample against
> the System RAM ranges in /proc/iomem.
>
> Setup: 384-CPU Hygon box, v7.3-based kernel, MySQL 8 under sysbench
> oltp_read_only, 400 threads. Each round is a fresh 60s
> sysbench run; after 15s of warmup, perf records ibs_op for 3s:
>
> $ perf record -e ibs_op/phy_addr_only=1/ -c 100000 --phys-data \
> -p <mysqld> # my patch
> $ perf record -e ibs_op// --phys-data --filter 'phys_addr != 0' \
> -c 100000 -p <mysqld> # your suggestion
>
> Rounds alternate p1 -> b1 -> p2 -> b2 -> p3 -> b3 so both methods see
> the same load conditions. Each record's phys_addr is then dumped with
> "perf script -F pid,tid,phys_addr" and bisect-checked against the
> System RAM ranges (read from /proc/iomem as root).
>
> samples phys_addr==0 non-zero in
> round filter captured (valid=1,MSR=0) System RAM
> ----- -------- --------- --------------- -----------
> p1 phy_only 15710042 0.10 % 98.61 %
> b1 bpf 14041851 0.00 % 98.55 %
> p2 phy_only 15580497 0.10 % 98.56 %
> b2 bpf 15416187 0.00 % 98.58 %
> p3 phy_only 15732582 0.10 % 98.59 %
> b3 bpf 15447397 0.00 % 98.58 %
>
> Two observations:
> 1. The validity ratio is identical for both methods. Of the non-zero
> addresses phy_addr_only delivers, 98.6 % fall inside System RAM --
> the same ratio the BPF-filtered set shows.
>
> 2. The only set-level difference is 0.10 % of samples where
> dc_phy_addr_valid is set but IBSDCPHYSAD reads 0.
The BPF filter is giving more accurate data here because neither kernel
nor userspace should access the first physical page:
$ sudo head -1 /proc/iomem
00000000-00000fff : Reserved
Thanks,
Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 8:52 Huang Shijie
2026-10-27 9:14 ` Ravi Bangoria
2026-10-28 7:52 ` Huang Shijie
2026-10-29 4:08 ` Ravi Bangoria
2026-10-29 11:17 ` Huang Shijie
2026-10-30 4:15 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2026-10-30 11:31 ` Huang Shijie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f151155a-54c1-41b1-8905-2347a1404001@amd.com \
--to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=1537577747@qq.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fangbaoshun@hygon.cn \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=huangsj@hygon.cn \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=lijing@hygon.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuqi@hygon.cn \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shijie8@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=wangfengyu@hygon.cn \
--cc=wujianyong@hygon.cn \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yingzhiwei@hygon.cn \
--cc=zhongyuan@hygon.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®