Re: [patch V3 00/12] rseq: Implement time slice extension mechanism

[Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>]

On 2025-11-12 01:30, Prakash Sangappa wrote:
[...]
> 
> The problem reproduces on a 2 socket AMD(384 cpus) bare metal system.
> It occurs soon after system boot up.  Does not reproduce on a 64cpu VM.
> 
> Managed to grep the ‘mksquashfs’ command that was executing, which  triggers the panic.
> 
> #ps -ef |grep mksquash.
> root       16614   10829  0 05:55 ?        00:00:00 mksquashfs /dev/null /var/tmp/dracut.iLs0z0/.squash-test.img -no-progress -comp xz
> 
> 

[...]

> ..
> [   65.143712] cid bitmask ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff 7fffffffffffffff
> [   65.143767] pid 16614, exec mksquashfs, maxcids 175 percpu 0 pcputhr 0, users 140 nrcpus_allwd 384
> [   65.143769] cid bitmask ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff
> 

It's weird that the cid bitmask is all f values (all 1). Aren't those
zeroed on mm init ?

> Followed by the panic.
> [   99.979256] watchdog: CPU114: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 114
> ..
[...]
> 
> As you can see, at least when it cannot find available cid’s it is in per-task mm cid mode.
> Perhaps it is taking longer to drop used cid’s? I have not delved into the mm cid management.
> Hopeful you can make out something from the above trace.
> 
> Let me know if you want me to add more tracing.

How soon is that after boot up ?

I'm starting to wonder if the num_possible_cpus() value used in
mm_cid_size() and mm_init_cid used respectively for mm allocation
and initialization may be read before it is initialized by the boot up
sequence ?

That's far fetched, but it would be good if we can double-check that
those are never called before the last call to init_cpu_possible and
set_cpu_possible().

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com