Re: [PATCH net-next v2] docs: ethtool: clarify the bit-by-bit bitset format description

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On 2/7/26 11:25 AM, Yohei Kojima wrote:
> Clarify the bit-by-bit bitset format's behavior around mandatory
> attributes and bit identification. More specifically, the following
> changes are made:
> 
> * Rephrase a misleading sentence which implies name and index are
>   mutually exclusive
> * Describe that ETHTOOL_A_BITSET_BITS nest is mandatory
> * Describe that a request fails if inconsistent identifiers are given
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yohei Kojima <yk@y-koj.net>
> ---
> Current ethtool-netlink documentation doesn't describe several behavior
> around bit-by-bit bitset, which makes it hard to develop a ethtool
> library without digging into the kernel code. This patch eases the gap
> between the kernel behavior and the documentation by adding descriptions
> around the mandatory attribute and bit identification.

This needs review by someone provided with English natural language
skills far better than mine. I'm wrapping the net-next PR right now;
this has to be deferred after the merge window, I'm sorry.

/P