* [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures
@ 2026-09-24 20:53 Ridham Khurana
2026-09-24 23:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:03 ` Christian Lamparter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ridham Khurana @ 2026-09-24 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-hwmon, linux-kernel, Christian Lamparter,
Alexander Sverdlin, Nikita Shubin, Shuah Khan, Jori Koolstra,
Brigham Campbell, linux-kernel-mentees, Ridham Khurana
temp1_input_show() drops the low bits of the temperature register by
dividing the raw value (raw / 32 on the LM70). These bits are not part
of the temperature: the LM70, LM71, LM74 and TMP122/TMP124 always
return some of them as 1, and the TMP125 fills them with copies of the
temperature LSB. Division rounds toward zero, so a negative temperature
with any of these bits set is reported one LSB too high.
For example, the TMP122 returns 0xffff for -0.0625 degrees C, which the
driver reports as 0. The LM70 returns 0xf39f for -25 degrees C, which
the driver reports as -24750.
Use an arithmetic right shift instead, which drops the low bits and
rounds down. tmp421 had a similar problem with negative values, fixed
by commit 724e8af85854 ("hwmon: (tmp421) fix rounding for negative
values").
Fixes: e1a8e913f97e ("[PATCH] lm70: New hardware monitoring driver")
Fixes: a86e94dc946d ("hwmon: (lm70) Add support for LM71 and LM74")
Fixes: cd929672a9ef ("hwmon: (lm70) Add ti,tmp125 support")
Signed-off-by: Ridham Khurana <khurana.ridham222@gmail.com>
---
Build-tested on arm64 and arm (ep93xx_defconfig) with CONFIG_SENSORS_LM70=m. Tested in QEMU (arm64 and arm) with a stub SPI controller returning the datasheet register values; not tested on hardware.
drivers/hwmon/lm70.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
index 8b525725fef4..b29bac7a4cc1 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm70.c
@@ -96,21 +96,21 @@ static ssize_t temp1_input_show(struct device *dev,
*/
switch (p_lm70->chip) {
case LM70_CHIP_LM70:
- val = ((int)raw / 32) * 250;
+ val = ((int)raw >> 5) * 250;
break;
case LM70_CHIP_TMP121:
case LM70_CHIP_TMP122:
case LM70_CHIP_LM74:
- val = ((int)raw / 8) * 625 / 10;
+ val = ((int)raw >> 3) * 625 / 10;
break;
case LM70_CHIP_LM71:
- val = ((int)raw / 4) * 3125 / 100;
+ val = ((int)raw >> 2) * 3125 / 100;
break;
case LM70_CHIP_TMP125:
- val = (sign_extend32(raw, 14) / 32) * 250;
+ val = (sign_extend32(raw, 14) >> 5) * 250;
break;
}
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures
2026-09-24 20:53 [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures Ridham Khurana
@ 2026-09-24 23:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:03 ` Christian Lamparter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2026-09-24 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ridham Khurana
Cc: linux-hwmon, linux-kernel, Christian Lamparter,
Alexander Sverdlin, Nikita Shubin, Shuah Khan, Jori Koolstra,
Brigham Campbell, linux-kernel-mentees
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 08:53:23PM +0000, Ridham Khurana wrote:
> temp1_input_show() drops the low bits of the temperature register by
> dividing the raw value (raw / 32 on the LM70). These bits are not part
> of the temperature: the LM70, LM71, LM74 and TMP122/TMP124 always
> return some of them as 1, and the TMP125 fills them with copies of the
> temperature LSB. Division rounds toward zero, so a negative temperature
> with any of these bits set is reported one LSB too high.
>
> For example, the TMP122 returns 0xffff for -0.0625 degrees C, which the
> driver reports as 0. The LM70 returns 0xf39f for -25 degrees C, which
> the driver reports as -24750.
>
> Use an arithmetic right shift instead, which drops the low bits and
> rounds down. tmp421 had a similar problem with negative values, fixed
> by commit 724e8af85854 ("hwmon: (tmp421) fix rounding for negative
> values").
Please stop providing those "had a similar problem" messages (or tell your
AI to do it). This is irrelevant for this fix.
>
> Fixes: e1a8e913f97e ("[PATCH] lm70: New hardware monitoring driver")
> Fixes: a86e94dc946d ("hwmon: (lm70) Add support for LM71 and LM74")
> Fixes: cd929672a9ef ("hwmon: (lm70) Add ti,tmp125 support")
> Signed-off-by: Ridham Khurana <khurana.ridham222@gmail.com>
Applied.
Thanks,
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures
2026-09-24 20:53 [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures Ridham Khurana
2026-09-24 23:24 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2026-09-25 18:03 ` Christian Lamparter
2026-09-25 21:19 ` Guenter Roeck
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian Lamparter @ 2026-09-25 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ridham Khurana, Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-hwmon, linux-kernel, Christian Lamparter,
Alexander Sverdlin, Nikita Shubin, Shuah Khan, Jori Koolstra,
Brigham Campbell, linux-kernel-mentees
Hi,
On 9/24/26 10:53 PM, Ridham Khurana wrote:
> temp1_input_show() drops the low bits of the temperature register by
> dividing the raw value (raw / 32 on the LM70). These bits are not part
> of the temperature: the LM70, LM71, LM74 and TMP122/TMP124 always
> return some of them as 1, and the TMP125 fills them with copies of the
> temperature LSB. Division rounds toward zero, so a negative temperature
> with any of these bits set is reported one LSB too high.
>
> For example, the TMP122 returns 0xffff for -0.0625 degrees C, which the
> driver reports as 0. The LM70 returns 0xf39f for -25 degrees C, which
> the driver reports as -24750.
>
> Use an arithmetic right shift instead, which drops the low bits and
> rounds down. tmp421 had a similar problem with negative values, fixed
> by commit 724e8af85854 ("hwmon: (tmp421) fix rounding for negative
> values").
For the TMP125 yes:
Reviewed-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
> Fixes: e1a8e913f97e ("[PATCH] lm70: New hardware monitoring driver")
> Fixes: a86e94dc946d ("hwmon: (lm70) Add support for LM71 and LM74")
> Fixes: cd929672a9ef ("hwmon: (lm70) Add ti,tmp125 support")
> Signed-off-by: Ridham Khurana <khurana.ridham222@gmail.com>
> ----
I wrote a little test program by hand (see below) and ran it on x64.
No idea if different archs behave differently or if
a clever unsafe math optimizing compiler flag will
convert the "/ 32" to a " >> 5" but I doubt that...
---
tmp125: raw:7ec0 tmp125_proposed: -2500 tmp125_now: -2500
tmp125: raw:7eff tmp125_proposed: -2250 tmp125_now: -2000 <--- loss of percision
tmp125: raw:7f00 tmp125_proposed: -2000 tmp125_now: -2000
tmp125: raw:7f3f tmp125_proposed: -1750 tmp125_now: -1500 <--- more
tmp125: raw:7f40 tmp125_proposed: -1500 tmp125_now: -1500
tmp125: raw:7f7f tmp125_proposed: -1250 tmp125_now: -1000 <--- and this
tmp125: raw:7f80 tmp125_proposed: -1000 tmp125_now: -1000
tmp125: raw:7fbf tmp125_proposed: -750 tmp125_now: -500 <--- also bad
tmp125: raw:7fc0 tmp125_proposed: -500 tmp125_now: -500
tmp125: raw:7fff tmp125_proposed: -250 tmp125_now: 0 <--- ouch
tmp125: raw: 0 tmp125_proposed: 0 tmp125_now: 0
tmp125: raw: 3f tmp125_proposed: 250 tmp125_now: 250
tmp125: raw: 40 tmp125_proposed: 500 tmp125_now: 500
tmp125: raw: 7f tmp125_proposed: 750 tmp125_now: 750
tmp125: raw: 80 tmp125_proposed: 1000 tmp125_now: 1000
tmp125: raw: bf tmp125_proposed: 1250 tmp125_now: 1250
tmp125: raw: c0 tmp125_proposed: 1500 tmp125_now: 1500
tmp125: raw: ff tmp125_proposed: 1750 tmp125_now: 1750
tmp125: raw: 100 tmp125_proposed: 2000 tmp125_now: 2000
tmp125: raw: 13f tmp125_proposed: 2250 tmp125_now: 2250
tmp125: raw: 140 tmp125_proposed: 2500 tmp125_now: 2500
(the positive values all look good.)
--- SNIP test.c program
#just name the file test.c and run make test (in a directory without any other makefile)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <asm-generic/int-l64.h>
static __s32 sign_extend32(__u32 value, int index)
{
__u8 shift = 31 - index;
return (__s32)(value << shift) >> shift;
}
static int tmp125_now(__s16 raw)
{
return (sign_extend32(raw, 14) / 32) * 250;
}
static int tmp125_proposed(__s16 raw)
{
return (sign_extend32(raw, 14) >> 5) * 250;
}
int main(int argc, char **args)
{
for (__s16 raw = -320; raw <= 320; raw+=32) {
__s16 tmp=raw & 0x7fe0 | ((raw & 32) >> 1) | ((raw & 32) >> 2) | ((raw & 32) >> 3) | ((raw & 32) >> 4) | ((raw & 32) >> 5);
printf("tmp125: raw:%4x tmp125_proposed:%6d tmp125_now:%6d\n", tmp, tmp125_proposed(tmp), tmp125_now(tmp));
}
return 0;
}
--- SNAP
FYI: TMP125 datasheet says:
"The Temperature Register of the TMP125 is a 16-bit, read-only register that stores
the output of the most recentconversion. However, temperature is represented by only10-bits,
which are in signed two’s complement format. Thefirst bit of the Temperature Register, D15,
is a leading zero. Bits D14 and [sic] D5 are used to indicate temperature. Bits D4 to D0
are the same as D5 (see Table 1)."
(They probably meant Bits D14 >>to<< D5 are used to indicate temperature).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures
2026-09-25 18:03 ` Christian Lamparter
@ 2026-09-25 21:19 ` Guenter Roeck
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2026-09-25 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Lamparter
Cc: Ridham Khurana, linux-hwmon, linux-kernel, Christian Lamparter,
Alexander Sverdlin, Nikita Shubin, Shuah Khan, Jori Koolstra,
Brigham Campbell, linux-kernel-mentees
On Fri, Sep 25, 2026 at 08:03:06PM +0200, Christian Lamparter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/24/26 10:53 PM, Ridham Khurana wrote:
> > temp1_input_show() drops the low bits of the temperature register by
> > dividing the raw value (raw / 32 on the LM70). These bits are not part
> > of the temperature: the LM70, LM71, LM74 and TMP122/TMP124 always
> > return some of them as 1, and the TMP125 fills them with copies of the
> > temperature LSB. Division rounds toward zero, so a negative temperature
> > with any of these bits set is reported one LSB too high.
> >
> > For example, the TMP122 returns 0xffff for -0.0625 degrees C, which the
> > driver reports as 0. The LM70 returns 0xf39f for -25 degrees C, which
> > the driver reports as -24750.
> >
> > Use an arithmetic right shift instead, which drops the low bits and
> > rounds down. tmp421 had a similar problem with negative values, fixed
> > by commit 724e8af85854 ("hwmon: (tmp421) fix rounding for negative
> > values").
>
> For the TMP125 yes:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
>
>
> > Fixes: e1a8e913f97e ("[PATCH] lm70: New hardware monitoring driver")
> > Fixes: a86e94dc946d ("hwmon: (lm70) Add support for LM71 and LM74")
> > Fixes: cd929672a9ef ("hwmon: (lm70) Add ti,tmp125 support")
> > Signed-off-by: Ridham Khurana <khurana.ridham222@gmail.com>
> > ----
> I wrote a little test program by hand (see below) and ran it on x64.
> No idea if different archs behave differently or if
> a clever unsafe math optimizing compiler flag will
> convert the "/ 32" to a " >> 5" but I doubt that...
>
> ---
> tmp125: raw:7ec0 tmp125_proposed: -2500 tmp125_now: -2500
> tmp125: raw:7eff tmp125_proposed: -2250 tmp125_now: -2000 <--- loss of percision
> tmp125: raw:7f00 tmp125_proposed: -2000 tmp125_now: -2000
> tmp125: raw:7f3f tmp125_proposed: -1750 tmp125_now: -1500 <--- more
> tmp125: raw:7f40 tmp125_proposed: -1500 tmp125_now: -1500
> tmp125: raw:7f7f tmp125_proposed: -1250 tmp125_now: -1000 <--- and this
> tmp125: raw:7f80 tmp125_proposed: -1000 tmp125_now: -1000
> tmp125: raw:7fbf tmp125_proposed: -750 tmp125_now: -500 <--- also bad
> tmp125: raw:7fc0 tmp125_proposed: -500 tmp125_now: -500
> tmp125: raw:7fff tmp125_proposed: -250 tmp125_now: 0 <--- ouch
> tmp125: raw: 0 tmp125_proposed: 0 tmp125_now: 0
> tmp125: raw: 3f tmp125_proposed: 250 tmp125_now: 250
> tmp125: raw: 40 tmp125_proposed: 500 tmp125_now: 500
> tmp125: raw: 7f tmp125_proposed: 750 tmp125_now: 750
> tmp125: raw: 80 tmp125_proposed: 1000 tmp125_now: 1000
> tmp125: raw: bf tmp125_proposed: 1250 tmp125_now: 1250
> tmp125: raw: c0 tmp125_proposed: 1500 tmp125_now: 1500
> tmp125: raw: ff tmp125_proposed: 1750 tmp125_now: 1750
> tmp125: raw: 100 tmp125_proposed: 2000 tmp125_now: 2000
> tmp125: raw: 13f tmp125_proposed: 2250 tmp125_now: 2250
> tmp125: raw: 140 tmp125_proposed: 2500 tmp125_now: 2500
>
Sorry, you lost me with the above. Are you suggesting that the patch is
correct, that it is only correct for TMP125, or something else ?
Guenter
> (the positive values all look good.)
>
> --- SNIP test.c program
>
> #just name the file test.c and run make test (in a directory without any other makefile)
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <asm-generic/int-l64.h>
>
> static __s32 sign_extend32(__u32 value, int index)
> {
> __u8 shift = 31 - index;
> return (__s32)(value << shift) >> shift;
> }
>
> static int tmp125_now(__s16 raw)
> {
> return (sign_extend32(raw, 14) / 32) * 250;
>
> }
>
> static int tmp125_proposed(__s16 raw)
> {
> return (sign_extend32(raw, 14) >> 5) * 250;
>
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **args)
> {
> for (__s16 raw = -320; raw <= 320; raw+=32) {
> __s16 tmp=raw & 0x7fe0 | ((raw & 32) >> 1) | ((raw & 32) >> 2) | ((raw & 32) >> 3) | ((raw & 32) >> 4) | ((raw & 32) >> 5);
> printf("tmp125: raw:%4x tmp125_proposed:%6d tmp125_now:%6d\n", tmp, tmp125_proposed(tmp), tmp125_now(tmp));
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> --- SNAP
>
> FYI: TMP125 datasheet says:
> "The Temperature Register of the TMP125 is a 16-bit, read-only register that stores
> the output of the most recentconversion. However, temperature is represented by only10-bits,
> which are in signed two’s complement format. Thefirst bit of the Temperature Register, D15,
> is a leading zero. Bits D14 and [sic] D5 are used to indicate temperature. Bits D4 to D0
> are the same as D5 (see Table 1)."
>
> (They probably meant Bits D14 >>to<< D5 are used to indicate temperature).
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-25 21:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-24 20:53 [PATCH] hwmon: (lm70) Fix rounding of negative temperatures Ridham Khurana
2026-09-24 23:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-09-25 18:03 ` Christian Lamparter
2026-09-25 21:19 ` Guenter Roeck
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®