From: Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>
To: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@bytedance.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Xi Wang <xii@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>,
Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior," <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Defer throttle when task exits to user
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 16:54:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f320d90db90df2d9583a1af4d83880f052768a64.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <610fcbfa-a8e7-483c-a112-579879628b99@amd.com>
On Tue, 2025-04-22 at 08:24 +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
> Hello Aaron,
>
> On 4/22/2025 7:40 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > anon_pipe_write()
> > > __wake_up_common()
> > > ep_poll_callback() {
> > > read_lock_irq(&ep->lock) /* Read lock acquired here */
> > I was confused by this function's name. I had thought irq is off but
> > then realized under PREEMPT_RT, read_lock_irq() doesn't disable irq...
>
> Yup! Most of the interrupt handlers are run by the IRQ threads on
> PREEMPT_RT and the ones that do run in the interrupt context have all
> been adapted to use non-blocking locks whose *_irq variants disables
> interrupts on PREEMPT_RT too.
>
> >
> > > __wake_up_common()
> > > ep_autoremove_wake_function()
> > > try_to_wake_up() /* Wakes up "epoll-stall" */
> > > preempt_schedule()
> > > ...
> > >
> > > # "epoll-stall-writer" has run out of bandwidth, needs replenish to run
> > Luckily in this "only throttle when ret2user" model, epoll-stall-writer
> > does not need replenish to run again(and then unblock the others).
>
> I can confirm that throttle deferral solves this issue. I have run Jan's
> reproducer for a long time without seeing any hangs on your series. I
> hope Florian can confirm the same.
>
Partially, yes.
First, let me clarify what I am testing: I'm testing with PREEMPT_RT
enabled, as that is the setup that makes problems in the field. For
those setups it's not a performance/jitter optimization it's a critical
fix. The system locks up completely.
I ported the series to 6.14. Background was stability and the
possibility to replace one of the devices in the field with a patched
version. We do not trust anything newer yet.
The test results: 6.14 + backport is still running fine for ~10 days
now on a system where the reproducer (that Jan posted already) crashed
a unpatched 6.14 in a couple of minutes. Success.
But: I also started a test with 6.14 vanilla (so unpatched) on a
different system. This one crashes within a couple of minutes. This is
a completely different story - as the series we're discussing here is
not even applied - but to be complete, this is the last message we get
from the device:
The device is completely locked up afterwards. PID 34 is ktimers on
CPU1.
kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: !se->on_rq
kernel: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 34 at kernel/sched/fair.c:699 update_entity_lag+0x7d/0x90
kernel: Modules linked in: veth xt_nat nft_chain_nat xt_MASQUERADE nf_nat nf_conntrack_netlink xfr>
kernel: sd_mod mptspi ata_generic mptscsih mptbase psmouse scsi_transport_spi ata_piix libata scs>
kernel: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 34 Comm: ktimers/1 Not tainted 6.14.0 #1
kernel: Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware7,1/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS VMW71.00V.242>
kernel: RIP: 0010:update_entity_lag+0x7d/0x90
kernel: Code: 0f 4d d7 48 89 53 78 5b 5d c3 cc cc cc cc 80 3d e7 f4 dd 01 00 75 a9 48 c7 c7 d0 81 >
kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffacf58012fbe8 EFLAGS: 00010082
kernel: RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9ee43ca00080 RCX: 0000000000000027
kernel: RDX: ffff9ee6efd21988 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff9ee6efd21980
kernel: RBP: ffff9ee421929800 R08: 00000000462951bd R09: ffffffff8e654811
kernel: R10: ffffffff8e654811 R11: ffffffff8e608a2a R12: 000000000000000e
kernel: R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 000000000000000e
kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9ee6efd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: CR2: 000000c00082a000 CR3: 0000000113416002 CR4: 00000000007706f0
kernel: PKRU: 55555554
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: <TASK>
kernel: ? __warn+0x91/0x190
kernel: ? update_entity_lag+0x7d/0x90
kernel: ? report_bug+0x164/0x190
kernel: ? handle_bug+0x58/0x90
kernel: ? exc_invalid_op+0x17/0x70
kernel: ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
kernel: ? ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
kernel: ? ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
kernel: ? ret_from_fork+0x31/0x50
kernel: ? update_entity_lag+0x7d/0x90
kernel: ? update_entity_lag+0x7d/0x90
kernel: dequeue_entity+0x90/0x5a0
kernel: dequeue_entities+0x121/0x640
kernel: dequeue_task_fair+0xbf/0x290
kernel: rt_mutex_setprio+0x37c/0x690
kernel: rtlock_slowlock_locked+0xca1/0x1860
kernel: ? lock_acquire+0xcb/0x2e0
kernel: ? run_ktimerd+0xe/0x80
kernel: ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
kernel: rt_spin_lock+0x86/0x160
kernel: __local_bh_disable_ip+0x9d/0x190
kernel: ksoftirqd_run_begin+0xe/0x30
kernel: run_ktimerd+0xe/0x80
kernel: smpboot_thread_fn+0xda/0x1d0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-22 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-09 12:07 Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] sched/fair: Add related data structure for task based throttle Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 3:58 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14 11:55 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 13:37 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] sched/fair: Handle throttle path " Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 8:54 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-14 12:10 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 14:39 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-14 15:02 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-30 10:01 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] sched/fair: Handle unthrottle " Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Take care of group/affinity/sched_class change for throttled task Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] sched/fair: get rid of throttled_lb_pair() Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] sched/fair: fix h_nr_runnable accounting with per-task throttle Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 12:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] sched/fair: alternative way of accounting throttle time Aaron Lu
2025-04-09 14:24 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-17 14:06 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-18 3:15 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-22 15:03 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-23 11:26 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-23 12:15 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-24 2:26 ` Aaron Lu
2025-05-07 9:09 ` Aaron Lu
2025-05-07 9:33 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-05-08 2:45 ` Aaron Lu
2025-05-08 6:13 ` Jan Kiszka
2025-05-08 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-04-14 3:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Defer throttle when task exits to user Chengming Zhou
2025-04-14 11:47 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-14 8:54 ` Florian Bezdeka
2025-04-14 12:04 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-15 5:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2025-04-15 6:05 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-15 6:09 ` Jan Kiszka
2025-04-15 8:45 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-15 10:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2025-04-15 11:14 ` K Prateek Nayak
[not found] ` <ec2cea83-07fe-472f-8320-911d215473fd@amd.com>
2025-04-15 15:49 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-22 2:10 ` Aaron Lu
2025-04-22 2:54 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-22 14:54 ` Florian Bezdeka [this message]
2025-04-15 10:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-14 16:34 ` K Prateek Nayak
2025-04-15 11:25 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f320d90db90df2d9583a1af4d83880f052768a64.camel@siemens.com \
--to=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=xii@google.com \
--cc=zhouchuyi@bytedance.com \
--cc=ziqianlu@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®