* [PATCH -next] fs/nfsd: Remove the unused variable sb
@ 2024-11-04 8:21 Jiapeng Chong
2024-11-04 13:17 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jiapeng Chong @ 2024-11-04 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chuck.lever
Cc: jlayton, neilb, okorniev, Dai.Ngo, tom, linux-nfs, linux-kernel,
Jiapeng Chong, Abaci Robot
Variable sb is not effectively used, so delete it.
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7988:22: warning: variable ‘sb’ set but not used.
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11648
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 5d47a28ef62d..45e487bf0582 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -7986,7 +7986,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl = NULL;
struct file_lock *file_lock = NULL;
struct file_lock *conflock = NULL;
- struct super_block *sb;
__be32 status = 0;
int lkflg;
int err;
@@ -8006,7 +8005,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, S_IFREG, 0);
if (status != nfs_ok)
return status;
- sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
if (lock->lk_is_new) {
if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
--
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH -next] fs/nfsd: Remove the unused variable sb
2024-11-04 8:21 [PATCH -next] fs/nfsd: Remove the unused variable sb Jiapeng Chong
@ 2024-11-04 13:17 ` Jeff Layton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Layton @ 2024-11-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jiapeng Chong, chuck.lever
Cc: neilb, okorniev, Dai.Ngo, tom, linux-nfs, linux-kernel,
Abaci Robot, Mike Snitzer
On Mon, 2024-11-04 at 16:21 +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Variable sb is not effectively used, so delete it.
>
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:7988:22: warning: variable ‘sb’ set but not used.
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11648
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> index 5d47a28ef62d..45e487bf0582 100644
> --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
> @@ -7986,7 +7986,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl = NULL;
> struct file_lock *file_lock = NULL;
> struct file_lock *conflock = NULL;
> - struct super_block *sb;
> __be32 status = 0;
> int lkflg;
> int err;
> @@ -8006,7 +8005,6 @@ nfsd4_lock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
> status = fh_verify(rqstp, &cstate->current_fh, S_IFREG, 0);
> if (status != nfs_ok)
> return status;
> - sb = cstate->current_fh.fh_dentry->d_sb;
>
> if (lock->lk_is_new) {
> if (nfsd4_has_session(cstate))
I would be fine with this, but there are some patches queued for v6.13
in Chuck's tree that start making use of this variable. I suggest that
we don't take this one for now.
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-11-04 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-11-04 8:21 [PATCH -next] fs/nfsd: Remove the unused variable sb Jiapeng Chong
2024-11-04 13:17 ` Jeff Layton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®