From: Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: cfg80211: fix WARN_ON during CAC cancelling
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 21:50:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f383c25d-fb76-4e3e-b900-7156f608bef0@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6b59e7a5f90b85dfc9146fa2cbdfe56c0a307a3e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
On 11/13/24 21:18, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-11-13 at 20:13 +0530, Aditya Kumar Singh wrote:
>> On 11/13/24 14:59, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/net/wireless/mlme.c b/net/wireless/mlme.c
>>>> index a5eb92d93074e6ce1e08fcc2790b80cf04ff08f8..2a932a036225a3e0587cf5c18a4e80e91552313b 100644
>>>> --- a/net/wireless/mlme.c
>>>> +++ b/net/wireless/mlme.c
>>>> @@ -1112,10 +1112,6 @@ void cfg80211_cac_event(struct net_device *netdev,
>>>> struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = wiphy_to_rdev(wiphy);
>>>> unsigned long timeout;
>>>>
>>>> - if (WARN_ON(wdev->valid_links &&
>>>> - !(wdev->valid_links & BIT(link_id))))
>>>> - return;
>>>> -
>>>> trace_cfg80211_cac_event(netdev, event, link_id);
>>>>
>>>> if (WARN_ON(!wdev->links[link_id].cac_started &&
>>>>
>>>
>>> This really doesn't seem right.
>>>
>>> Perhaps the order in teardown should be changed?
>>
>> I thought about it but couldn't really come down to a convincing approach.
>>
>> The thing is when CAC in ongoing and hostapd process is killed, there is
>> no specific event apart from link delete which hostapd sends.
>>
>
> so we do have link removal, why doesn't that work?
Because link ID is cleared from the bitmap well before link stop is
called. As mentioned in commit message, this is the flow -
nl80211_remove_link
> cfg80211_remove_link -> link ID gets updated here
> ieee80211_del_intf_link
> ieee80211_vif_set_links
> ieee80211_vif_update_links
> ieee80211_link_stop -> this ultimately tries to stop
CAC if it is ongoing.
>
>> Will it be
>> okay to add a new NL command to stop radar detection? Something opposite
>> of what start_radar_detection command does?
>>
>
> No, obviously not.
>
> johannes
--
Aditya
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-13 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-13 6:27 Aditya Kumar Singh
2024-11-13 9:29 ` Johannes Berg
2024-11-13 14:43 ` Aditya Kumar Singh
2024-11-13 15:48 ` Johannes Berg
2024-11-13 16:20 ` Aditya Kumar Singh [this message]
2024-11-15 8:14 ` Johannes Berg
2024-11-19 5:53 ` Aditya Kumar Singh
2024-11-20 8:59 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f383c25d-fb76-4e3e-b900-7156f608bef0@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_adisi@quicinc.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®