mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	quic_bkumar@quicinc.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	quic_chennak@quicinc.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	arnd@arndb.de, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] misc: fastrpc: Add missing unmapping user-requested remote heap
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 10:50:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f3d376cc-6e2d-4ac3-88f6-3104eec67acf@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO9ioeX1uE3ty5oSezYOLJKqf8G5dLYAS5nRiNvryWTk0RPdEQ@mail.gmail.com>



On 5/22/2025 5:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, 22 May 2025 at 08:01, Ekansh Gupta
> <ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/19/2025 7:04 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 04:28:34PM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>>>> On 5/19/2025 4:22 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 09:58:25AM +0530, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
>>>>>> User request for remote heap allocation is supported using ioctl
>>>>>> interface but support for unmap is missing. This could result in
>>>>>> memory leak issues. Add unmap user request support for remote heap.
>>>>> Can this memory be in use by the remote proc?
>>>> Remote heap allocation request is only intended for audioPD. Other PDs
>>>> running on DSP are not intended to use this request.
>>> 'Intended'. That's fine. I asked a different question: _can_ it be in
>>> use? What happens if userspace by mistake tries to unmap memory too
>>> early? Or if it happens intentionally, at some specific time during
>>> work.
>> If the unmap is restricted to audio daemon, then the unmap will only
>> happen if the remoteproc is no longer using this memory.
>>
>> But without this restriction, yes it possible that some userspace process
>> calls unmap which tries to move the ownership back to HLOS which the
>> remoteproc is still using the memory. This might lead to memory access
>> problems.
> This needs to be fixed in the driver. We need to track which memory is
> being used by the remoteproc and unmap it once remoteproc stops using
> it, without additional userspace intervention.
If it's the audio daemon which is requesting for unmap then it basically means that
the remoteproc is no longer using the memory. Audio PD can request for both grow
and shrink operations for it's dedicated heap. The case of grow is already supported
from fastrpc_req_mmap but the case of shrink(when remoteproc is no longer using the
memory) is not yet available. This memory is more specific to audio PD rather than
complete remoteproc.

If we have to control this completely from driver then I see a problem in freeing/unmapping
the memory when the PD is no longer using the memory.
>


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-12  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13  4:28 [PATCH v1 0/5] misc: fastrpc: Add missing bug fixes Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-13  4:28 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] misc: fastrpc: Add NULL check to fastrpc_buf_free to prevent crash Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19  9:25   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-05-19 10:09     ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 10:40       ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-05-19 10:50         ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-13  4:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] misc: fastrpc: Move all remote heap allocations to a new list Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 10:16   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 11:06     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 13:29       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-22  4:54         ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-22 12:09           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-12  5:13             ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-06-12 11:16               ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 11:35   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-05-22  5:09     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-13  4:28 ` [PATCH v1 3/5] misc: fastrpc: Fix initial memory allocation for Audio PD memory pool Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 10:17   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 10:53     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 13:31       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-22  4:58         ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-22 12:11           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 11:41   ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-05-22  5:11     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-13  4:28 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] misc: fastrpc: Remove buffer from list prior to unmap operation Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 10:20   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 10:56     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 13:32       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-13  4:28 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] misc: fastrpc: Add missing unmapping user-requested remote heap Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 10:52   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 10:58     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-19 13:34       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-22  5:01         ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-05-22 12:13           ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-12  5:20             ` Ekansh Gupta [this message]
2025-06-12  8:05               ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-06-12  9:32                 ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-06-12 10:24                   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-07-09  5:43                     ` Ekansh Gupta
2025-07-19  9:44                       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-07-23  9:24                         ` Ekansh Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f3d376cc-6e2d-4ac3-88f6-3104eec67acf@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=ekansh.gupta@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_bkumar@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_chennak@quicinc.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®