From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/9] coresight: Appropriately disable programming clocks
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:53:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f565a64e-62d8-4cb3-b1b1-6de981b1052a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250609163840.GL8020@e132581.arm.com>
On 09/06/25 10:08 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 05:11:21PM +0100, Suzuki Kuruppassery Poulose wrote:
>> On 09/06/2025 17:00, Leo Yan wrote:
>>> Some CoreSight components have programming clocks (pclk) and are enabled
>>> using clk_get() and clk_prepare_enable(). However, in many cases, these
>>> clocks are not disabled when modules exit and only released by clk_put().
>>>
>>> To fix the issue, this commit refactors coresight_get_enable_apb_pclk()
>>> by replacing clk_get() and clk_prepare_enable() with
>>> devm_clk_get_enabled() for enabling APB clock. Callers are updated
>>> to reuse the returned error value.
>>>
>>> With the change, programming clocks are managed as resources in driver
>>> model layer, allowing clock cleanup to be handled automatically. As a
>>> result, manual cleanup operations are no longer needed and are removed
>>> from the Coresight drivers.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 73d779a03a76 ("coresight: etm4x: Change etm4_platform_driver driver for MMIO devices")
>>
>> This looks suspicious. This patch covers a lot of components, but the
>> above commit is only affecting ETMv4 ?
>
> Since commit 73d779a03a76 is the earliest patch that introduced the
> issue, it has been selected as the fix tag. We assume this will cover
> any subsequent changes that have the same issue.
Although I am not still sure about this patch actually requiring a
'Fixes:' tag as it just transitions into the device managed clocks
rather than fixing an existing issue. But choosing the first commit
makes sense as Leo has explained.
>
>> The patch as such looks good to me.
>
> Thanks for review!
>
>> Suzuki
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-24 4:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-09 16:00 [PATCH v3 0/9] coresight: Fix and improve clock usage Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] coresight: tmc: Support atclk Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] coresight: catu: " Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] coresight: etm4x: " Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] coresight: Appropriately disable programming clocks Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-09 16:38 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-24 4:23 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2025-06-24 4:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] coresight: Appropriately disable trace bus clocks Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:14 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-09 16:43 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] coresight: Avoid enable programming clock duplicately Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-09 17:14 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-10 10:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-10 12:03 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-24 4:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-24 5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] coresight: Consolidate clock enabling Leo Yan
2025-06-24 5:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-24 10:08 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] coresight: Make clock sequence consistent Leo Yan
2025-06-09 16:00 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] coresight: Refactor runtime PM Leo Yan
2025-06-10 10:07 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f565a64e-62d8-4cb3-b1b1-6de981b1052a@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®