[PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: see link lost as fatal

[PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: see link lost as fatal

[Kiwoong Kim]

This event is raised when link is lost as specified
in UFSHCI spec. At the time, initializing UFS interface
needs to be done.

Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
index 6a295c8..a7ff0e5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static inline u32 ufshci_version(u32 major, u32 minor)
 #define INT_FATAL_ERRORS	(DEVICE_FATAL_ERROR |\
 				CONTROLLER_FATAL_ERROR |\
 				SYSTEM_BUS_FATAL_ERROR |\
-				CRYPTO_ENGINE_FATAL_ERROR)
+				CRYPTO_ENGINE_FATAL_ERROR |\
+				UIC_LINK_LOST)
 
 /* HCS - Host Controller Status 30h */
 #define DEVICE_PRESENT				0x1
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH v1] scsi: ufs: see link lost as fatal

[Bart Van Assche]

On 1/17/22 02:37, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> This event is raised when link is lost as specified
> in UFSHCI spec. At the time, initializing UFS interface
> needs to be done.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> index 6a295c8..a7ff0e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h
> @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static inline u32 ufshci_version(u32 major, u32 minor)
>   #define INT_FATAL_ERRORS	(DEVICE_FATAL_ERROR |\
>   				CONTROLLER_FATAL_ERROR |\
>   				SYSTEM_BUS_FATAL_ERROR |\
> -				CRYPTO_ENGINE_FATAL_ERROR)
> +				CRYPTO_ENGINE_FATAL_ERROR |\
> +				UIC_LINK_LOST)
>   
>   /* HCS - Host Controller Status 30h */
>   #define DEVICE_PRESENT				0x1

A patch description should not only explain what is changed but also why
a change is being made. Will the above patch cause the UFS error handler
to trigger a controller reset after the link has been lost? I'm missing
an explanation of why that change is necessary and also of why that
change is the right thing to do. All I found in the UFSHCI specification
about link loss is the following: "UIC Link Lost Status Enable (ULLSE): 
When set and IS.ULLS is set, the controller shall generate an 
interrupt." and also "UIC Link Lost Status (ULLS): This indicates a 
condition where remote end is trying to reestablish a link and the link 
is lost. This bit corresponds to the UniPro DME_LINKLOST.ind SAP primitive."

Did I perhaps overlook something?

Thanks,

Bart.