From: Cai Xinchen <caixinchen1@huawei.com>
To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Cc: <mic@digikod.net>, <gnoack@google.com>, <paul@paul-moore.com>,
<jmorris@namei.org>, <serge@hallyn.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>,
<skhan@linuxfoundation.org>, <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
<dakr@kernel.org>, <dlemoal@kernel.org>, <hch@lst.de>,
<axboe@kernel.dk>, <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
<brauner@kernel.org>, <jack@suse.cz>, <dhowells@redhat.com>,
<code@tyhicks.com>, <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
<sj1557.seo@samsung.com>, <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>,
<hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>, <cel@kernel.org>,
<jlayton@kernel.org>, <neil@brown.name>, <okorniev@redhat.com>,
<Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>, <tom@talpey.com>, <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
<senozhatsky@chromium.org>, <chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com>,
<zohar@linux.ibm.com>, <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
<dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>, <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
<stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>, <omosnacek@gmail.com>,
<casey@schaufler-ca.com>, <nanx95726@gmail.com>,
<djwong@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<driver-core@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <netfs@lists.linux.dev>,
<ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org>, <exfat@lists.linux.dev>,
<linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
<selinux@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<xiujianfeng@huawei.com>, <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -next 03/12] fs: pass struct path to xattr helpers
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 16:44:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f697efa0-81c9-4ace-b9cc-d672b98dfc9d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxhMhcxq5+crz84f8xj+Wi1bHhNqa_TecP-RvipheBR+ug@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you for review
I will switched to ovl_path_real in the next version.
ovl_creds is a prepare_creds() clone of the mounter, so unless
the mounter itself was sandboxed, the clone carries no Landlock
domain and every check short-circuits. The new rights are also
enforced at the security_inode_*xattr() call sites in fs/xattr.c,
which run with the user-visible overlay path.
The exception is an unprivileged overlay mount by an already
sandboxed mounter: the domain is inherited into
creator_cred through the cred_prepare hook, so the internal
real-path calls *do* get checked there. For this series that
means:
- ovl_xattr_get/set/ovl_listxattr() forwarding and the
ovl_setattr() -> ovl_do_notify_change() forwarding would be
checked against the upper/lower paths;
- copy-up would newly require the metadata rights on the backing
directories too (ovl_copy_xattr() calls the security-checking
vfs_listxattr()/vfs_setxattr());
- stat() is unaffected: ovl_getattr() goes through the _nosec
variant.
This is not Landlock-specific: every LSM
that keeps its state in the cred blob inherits the mounter's
context into creator_cred through cred_prepare.
On 9/24/2026 7:12 PM, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> that's ovl_path_real()
>
> I have no technical issue with the ovl patch bits in this series.
> Anyway, I guess landlock is not going to enforce anything on the
> private mnt with ovl_creds anyway?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-28 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 10:48 [PATCH RFC -next 00/12] landlock: Add READ_METADATA and WRITE_METADATA access rights Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 01/12] fs: pass struct path to notify_change() Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 02/12] LSM: pass struct path to the inode_setsecctx hook Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 03/12] fs: pass struct path to xattr helpers Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 11:12 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-28 8:44 ` Cai Xinchen [this message]
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 04/12] fs: pass struct path to POSIX ACL helpers Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 05/12] LSM: pass struct path to the inode_setattr hook Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 06/12] LSM: pass struct path to the inode xattr hooks Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 07/12] LSM: pass struct path to the inode posix acl hooks Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 08/12] landlock: Add READ_METADATA and WRITE_METADATA access rights Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 09/12] landlock: Implement metadata access hooks Cai Xinchen
2026-09-26 8:38 ` Günther Noack
2026-09-28 6:19 ` Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 10/12] selftests/landlock: Add tests for metadata access rights Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 11/12] samples/landlock: Add metadata rights to sandboxer Cai Xinchen
2026-09-24 10:48 ` [PATCH RFC -next 12/12] Documentation: Update landlock doc for metadata rights Cai Xinchen
2026-09-25 15:33 ` [PATCH RFC -next 00/12] landlock: Add READ_METADATA and WRITE_METADATA access rights Christian Brauner
2026-09-25 17:07 ` Paul Moore
2026-09-28 19:27 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-09-25 18:03 ` Justin Suess
2026-09-26 7:56 ` Günther Noack
2026-09-28 17:13 ` Justin Suess
2026-09-28 19:25 ` Mickaël Salaün
2026-09-26 8:27 ` Günther Noack
2026-09-28 6:52 ` Cai Xinchen
2026-09-28 19:46 ` Mickaël Salaün
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f697efa0-81c9-4ace-b9cc-d672b98dfc9d@huawei.com \
--to=caixinchen1@huawei.com \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=nanx95726@gmail.com \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=okorniev@redhat.com \
--cc=omosnacek@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@talpey.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®