mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhou, Yun" <yun.zhou@windriver.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: cem@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, willy@infradead.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hwenwur@gmail.com,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 12:08:33 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7e7b1f9-ddee-4668-9cea-830264f984f5@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720083940.GA21000@lst.de>

Hi all,

On 7/20/2026 4:39 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 05:57:32PM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:
>> When __xfs_trans_commit() fails in xfs_trans_roll(), the NOFS context
>> is cleared but only restored in the success path.  This leaves the
>> error path without nofs protection, causing a circular lock dependency
>> between xfs_nondir_ilock_class and fs_reclaim:
>>
>>         CPU0                    CPU1
>>         ----                    ----
>>    lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
>>                                 lock(fs_reclaim);
>>                                 lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
>>    lock(fs_reclaim);
>>
>> Fix this by transferring the nofs context from the old transaction to
>> the new one in xfs_trans_dup() via memalloc_flags_move(), so it remains
>> active throughout the entire roll sequence regardless of commit success
>> or failure.
> 
> Good find, but we keep adding more magic here that will just lead
> to further bugs.  Your previous version was much better, and could
> be improved by also removing the hiding under xfs_trans_set_context as
> a follow on.
> 
> Having a maze of single or two caller magic macros that modify global
> (or rather global-ish as it's per thread) state makes hairy bits like
> this really error prone as seen by the bugs now found.

It's been a few days since the last discussion. I'm planning to
respin as v3 following Christoph's suggestion (drop the helper,
re-save directly in xfs_trans_roll). Any other suggestions?

Thanks,
Yun

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24  4:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-19  9:57 [PATCH v2 0/2] " Yun Zhou
2026-07-19  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: introduce memalloc_flags_move() for transferring allocation scopes Yun Zhou
2026-07-19 20:57   ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-20  4:43     ` Zhou, Yun
2026-07-19  9:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] xfs: restore nofs context unconditionally in xfs_trans_roll Yun Zhou
2026-07-20  8:39   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-24  4:08     ` Zhou, Yun [this message]
2026-07-24  5:27       ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7e7b1f9-ddee-4668-9cea-830264f984f5@windriver.com \
    --to=yun.zhou@windriver.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hwenwur@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome