mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu>,
	cristian_ci <cristian_ci@protonmail.com>,
	"robh@kernel.org" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"krzk+dt@kernel.org" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"andersson@kernel.org" <andersson@kernel.org>,
	"konradybcio@kernel.org" <konradybcio@kernel.org>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht"
	<~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht>,
	"phone-devel@vger.kernel.org" <phone-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: Add device tree for Billion Capture+
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 12:11:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f83cc435-7736-4003-b5b2-a84e2fe725c6@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ff29229c-5458-4500-9b11-8044a461cd36@lucaweiss.eu>

On 6/21/25 11:27 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
> On 21-06-2025 9:07 a.m., cristian_ci wrote:
>> On Saturday, June 21st, 2025 at 00:20, Luca Weiss <luca@lucaweiss.eu> wrote:
>>
>>>> +
>>>> + reserved-memory {
>>>> + qseecom@0 {
>>>
>>>
>>> qseecom@84a00000 ?
>>>
>>>> + reg = <0x00 0x84a00000 0x00 0x1900000>;
>>>> + no-map;
>>>> + };
>>
>> Looking at downstream devicetree, every reserved-memory nodes with "removed-dma-pool" compatible has unit address 0. OTOH, kernel documentation [1] says:
>> "  Following the generic-names recommended practice, node names should
>>    reflect the purpose of the node (ie. "framebuffer" or "dma-pool").
>>    Unit address (@<address>) should be appended to the name if the node
>>    is a static allocation."
>>
>> In my case, downstream devicetree shows:
>>
>>         other_ext_region@0 {
>>             compatible = "removed-dma-pool";
>>             no-map;
>>             reg = <0x00 0x84a00000 0x00 0x1e00000>;
>>         };
>>
>> which will be 'qseecom' reserved-memory node in mainline devicetree.
>>
>> OTOH, 'qseecom' node in downstream devicetree also shows:
>>
>>         qseecom@84a00000 {
>>             compatible = "qcom,qseecom";
>>             reg = <0x84a00000 0x1900000>;
>>                          ...
>>
>> If you confirm what you suggest, 'qseecom' reserved-memory node will look like the following:
>>
>>         qseecom_mem: qseecom@84a00000 {
>>             reg = <0x0 0x84a00000 0x0 0x1900000>;
>>             no-map;
>>         };
>>
>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.yaml
> 
> The name (qseecom@84a00000) mostly does not matter at runtime, it's just a nice label we give it. The reg is the important bit that gets used in reserved-memory.
> 
> But actually re-checking, I don't think your reserved-memory works right now, msm8953.dtsi has
> 
>     soc: soc@0 {
>         #address-cells = <1>;
>         #size-cells = <1>;
> 
> which means that you should only have one value for address, and one for size, so "reg = <0x84a00000 0x1900000>;". This is different to most other Qualcomm arm64 SoCs.

reserved-memory {
                #address-cells = <2>;
                #size-cells = <2>;
                ranges;


Konrad

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-21 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 21:51 [PATCH 0/3] Add initial " Cristian Cozzolino via B4 Relay
2025-06-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Flipkart Cristian Cozzolino via B4 Relay
2025-06-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Add Billion Capture+ Cristian Cozzolino via B4 Relay
2025-06-20 21:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: Add device tree for " Cristian Cozzolino via B4 Relay
2025-06-20 22:20   ` Luca Weiss
2025-06-21  7:07     ` cristian_ci
2025-06-21  9:27       ` Luca Weiss
2025-06-21 10:11         ` Konrad Dybcio [this message]
2025-06-21 10:53           ` Luca Weiss
2025-06-21 11:34             ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-21 10:16   ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-21 19:31     ` cristian_ci
2025-06-23 10:11       ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-23 14:49         ` cristian_ci
2025-06-23 14:51           ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-06-23  2:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add initial " Rob Herring (Arm)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f83cc435-7736-4003-b5b2-a84e2fe725c6@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian_ci@protonmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca@lucaweiss.eu \
    --cc=phone-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®