Re: [PATCH-cpuset v10 2/2] cpuset: use Union-Find to optimize the merging of cpumasks

[Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>]

On 7/3/24 06:49, Xavier wrote:
>
> Hi Michal and Longman,
>
> Please confirm my explanation about cgroup v2 below.
>
>
> At 2024-07-03 17:40:49, "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 02:37:27PM GMT, Xavier <xavier_qy@163.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -1102,31 +1101,25 @@ static int generate_sched_domains(cpumask_var_t **domains,
>>>   	if (root_load_balance && (csn == 1))
>>>   		goto single_root_domain;
>>>   
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < csn; i++)
>>> -		csa[i]->pn = i;
>>> -	ndoms = csn;
>>> -
>>> -restart:
>>> -	/* Find the best partition (set of sched domains) */
>>> -	for (i = 0; i < csn; i++) {
>>> -		struct cpuset *a = csa[i];
>>> -		int apn = a->pn;
>>> -
>>> -		for (j = 0; j < csn; j++) {
>>> -			struct cpuset *b = csa[j];
>>> -			int bpn = b->pn;
>>> -
>>> -			if (apn != bpn && cpusets_overlap(a, b)) {
>>> -				for (k = 0; k < csn; k++) {
>>> -					struct cpuset *c = csa[k];
>>> +	if (!cgrpv2) {
>> I'm surprised that original code wasn't branched on this on you add it
>> here. Why is UF used only for v1 code?
>>
> In the Patch v6, I explained to Longman that based on his new patch, the overlapping check and
> merge operations for cpusets are skipped in the case of cgroup v2. Because for cgroup v2,
> doms[i] is merely copied from csa[i] rather than merged.
> This needs further confirmation from Longman.

Actually, I would like to keep the cpuset merging part for both cgroup 
v1 and v2. I did notice that the hotplug code path can sometimes cause 
overlapping partition roots in some intermediate states. I will try to 
get it of that and use the merging part to verify that all partition 
roots are mutually exclusive.

Cheers,
Longman