[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852bt: Remove redundant off_reverse variables

[PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852bt: Remove redundant off_reverse variables

[Liao Yuanhong]

The variable off_reverse and its related code are completely redundant in
the function. Remove them to clean the code.

Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c | 12 ++----------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
index d0e299803225..f23754a5c7b9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
@@ -1799,22 +1799,14 @@ static void _dpk_onoff(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_rf_path path, bool o
 {
 	struct rtw89_dpk_info *dpk = &rtwdev->dpk;
 	u8 val, kidx = dpk->cur_idx[path];
-	bool off_reverse;
 
-	val = dpk->is_dpk_enable && !off && dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
-
-	if (off)
-		off_reverse = false;
-	else
-		off_reverse = true;
-
-	val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
+	val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
 
 	rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_DPD_CH0A + (path << 8) + (kidx << 2),
 			       BIT(24), val);
 
 	rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[DPK] S%d[%d] DPK %s !!!\n", path,
-		    kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse));
+		    kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off));
 }
 
 static void _dpk_one_shot(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
-- 
2.34.1

RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852bt: Remove redundant off_reverse variables

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> wrote:
> The variable off_reverse and its related code are completely redundant in
> the function. Remove them to clean the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c | 12 ++----------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> index d0e299803225..f23754a5c7b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> @@ -1799,22 +1799,14 @@ static void _dpk_onoff(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_rf_path path, bool o
>  {
>         struct rtw89_dpk_info *dpk = &rtwdev->dpk;
>         u8 val, kidx = dpk->cur_idx[path];
> -       bool off_reverse;
> 
> -       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable && !off && dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
> -
> -       if (off)
> -               off_reverse = false;
> -       else
> -               off_reverse = true;
> -
> -       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
> +       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;

The previous patch has merged. Please re-spin this patch on top of rtw-next [1].
The subject should be "[PATCH rtw-next]", so NIPA can do correct tree selection. 

[1] https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git rtw-next

> 
>         rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_DPD_CH0A + (path << 8) + (kidx << 2),
>                                BIT(24), val);
> 
>         rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[DPK] S%d[%d] DPK %s !!!\n", path,
> -                   kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse));
> +                   kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off));
>  }
> 
>  static void _dpk_one_shot(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
> --
> 2.34.1

RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: 8852bt: Remove redundant off_reverse variables

[Ping-Ke Shih]

Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com> wrote:
> > The variable off_reverse and its related code are completely redundant in
> > the function. Remove them to clean the code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Liao Yuanhong <liaoyuanhong@vivo.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c | 12 ++----------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> > b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> > index d0e299803225..f23754a5c7b9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c
> > @@ -1799,22 +1799,14 @@ static void _dpk_onoff(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_rf_path path, bool
> o
> >  {
> >         struct rtw89_dpk_info *dpk = &rtwdev->dpk;
> >         u8 val, kidx = dpk->cur_idx[path];
> > -       bool off_reverse;
> >
> > -       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable && !off && dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;

Please use this style. Otherwise, compiler warns

../drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt_rfk.c:1803:34: warning: dubious: x & !y


> > -
> > -       if (off)
> > -               off_reverse = false;
> > -       else
> > -               off_reverse = true;
> > -
> > -       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
> > +       val = dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off & dpk->bp[path][kidx].path_ok;
> 
> The previous patch has merged. Please re-spin this patch on top of rtw-next [1].
> The subject should be "[PATCH rtw-next]", so NIPA can do correct tree selection.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git rtw-next
> 
> >
> >         rtw89_phy_write32_mask(rtwdev, R_DPD_CH0A + (path << 8) + (kidx << 2),
> >                                BIT(24), val);
> >
> >         rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[DPK] S%d[%d] DPK %s !!!\n", path,
> > -                   kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & off_reverse));
> > +                   kidx, str_enable_disable(dpk->is_dpk_enable & !off));
> >  }
> >
> >  static void _dpk_one_shot(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, enum rtw89_phy_idx phy,
> > --
> > 2.34.1
>