From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Yuan-Hao Hsu <aa9736195201@gmail.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm/gup: batch contiguous same-folio PTEs into one refcount grab
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2026 09:35:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa017227-448b-468f-9797-33c02854f018@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102193026.3860700-9-riel@surriel.com>
On 11/2/26 20:30, Rik van Riel wrote:
> follow_page_pte() now walks a whole page table in one call, but still
> resolves and commits each PTE on its own, so a PTE-mapped large folio
> (mTHP) pays one try_grab_folio() per subpage.
>
> Add gup_pte_batch_len() and give gup_grab_folio_pages() a run
> length. Each run starts with a full per-PTE resolve, then
> gup_pte_batch_len() finds how many more PTEs extend it with a pte_same()
> scan rather than a re-derivation of each page, and the run is committed
> with one refcount grab. Runs stop at folio boundaries, so plain base
> pages are unaffected.
>
> Gather the dirty bits from all the PTEs in a batch, in order to mark
> the folio dirty for FOLL_WRITE.
>
> Same benchmark as the previous change, with before again taken at the
> base of the series:
>
> gup_test -L -m 256 -n 65536 -r 16 -t
> before after
> 64 kB mTHP 2946 us 231 us (12.8x)
> 4 kB base (control) 2753 us 1198 us (2.3x)
> 2 MB THP (control) 72 us 71 us
>
> The 4 kB column is the previous change's 2.3x, unchanged: base pages
> share no folio, so there is nothing to batch. 64 kB mTHP goes from that
> change's 2.2x to 12.8x, a further 5.9x from committing a run with one
> refcount grab instead of one per subpage.
>
> With FOLL_TOUCH, folio_mark_accessed() runs once per run instead of
> once per page: 512 calls before and 32 after over 2 MB of 64 kB
> folios, leaving them referenced but inactive after the first call.
> That matches the huge-page and fast paths, which mark once
> per folio. (Measured by Yuan-Hao Hsu.)
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> ---
> mm/gup.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index 67e20b326be6e..47f204e21a3a7 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -937,6 +937,35 @@ static long gup_lookup_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return how many PTEs map consecutive pages of the same folio and can be
> + * committed as one run. Always at least 1.
> + *
> + * The write-fault and unshare checks in gup_lookup_pte() are per PTE, but a
> + * writable run needs no repeat: a writable anon page is exclusive. A read-only
> + * run under FOLL_WRITE or FOLL_PIN does need the per-page check, so it stays
> + * one page at a time.
That's a clear indication that this needs more work.
I'll try to get to it soon and see how it could be done in a cleaner way, likely
it should be based on top of the gup-fast series where we will have helpers to
check for required unsharing of multiple PTEs.
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-03 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 19:30 [RFC PATCH v5 0/8] batch lookups in follow_page_mask() Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 1/8] mm/gup: break out gup_fill_pages() helper Rik van Riel
2026-11-03 8:43 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 2/8] mm/gup: convert follow_page_mask() to return a long Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 3/8] mm/gup: split out folio grab-and-store helper Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 4/8] mm/gup: break out gup_lookup_pte() helper Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 5/8] mm/gup: fill the pages array outside the pud/pmd lock Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] mm/gup: return a huge page's full count from follow_page_mask() Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] mm/gup: walk multiple PTEs per follow_page_pte() call Rik van Riel
2026-11-02 19:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] mm/gup: batch contiguous same-folio PTEs into one refcount grab Rik van Riel
2026-11-03 8:35 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa017227-448b-468f-9797-33c02854f018@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=aa9736195201@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®