From: Shane <gnome42@gmail.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Alexey Dobriyan" <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
rjw@sisk.pl, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
den@openvz.org, "Pavel Emelyanov" <xemul@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] proc: Remove/Fix proc generic d_revalidate
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 12:15:44 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa4052ef0712080915o5e76363dvbda41d9394db4b77@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1lk85q0cw.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
On Dec 7, 2007 11:25 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Ultimately to implement /proc perfectly we need an implementation
> of d_revalidate because files and directories can be removed behind
> the back of the VFS, and d_revalidate is the only way we can let
> the VFS know that this has happened.
>
> Unfortunately the linux VFS can not cope with anything in the path
> to a mount point going away. So a proper d_revalidate method that
> calls d_drop also needs to call have_submounts which is moderately
> expensive, so you really don't want a d_revalidate method that
> unconditionally calls it, but instead only calls it when the
> backing object has really gone away.
>
> proc generic entries only disappear on module_unload (when
> not counting the fledgling network namespace) so it is quite rare
> that we actually encounter that case and has not actually caused
> us real world trouble yet.
>
> So until we get a proper test for keeping dentries in the dcache
> fix the current d_revalidate method by completely removing it. This
> returns us to the current status quo.
>
> So with CONFIG_NETNS=n things should look as they have always looked.
>
> For CONFIG_NETNS=y things work most of the time but there are a few
> rare corner cases that don't behave properly. As the network namespace
> is barely present in 2.6.24 this should not be a problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/generic.c | 7 -------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/generic.c b/fs/proc/generic.c
> index 8d49838..6a2fe51 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/generic.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/generic.c
> @@ -374,16 +374,9 @@ static int proc_delete_dentry(struct dentry * dentry)
> return 1;
> }
>
> -static int proc_revalidate_dentry(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
> -{
> - d_drop(dentry);
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations =
> {
> .d_delete = proc_delete_dentry,
> - .d_revalidate = proc_revalidate_dentry,
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 1.5.3.rc6.17.g1911
Confirmed. This patch fixes the problem for me.
Shane
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-08 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-07 4:45 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression Shane
2007-12-07 12:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 18:14 ` Shane
2007-12-07 18:36 ` Shane
2007-12-07 18:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 18:55 ` Shane
2007-12-07 19:16 ` Shane
2007-12-07 19:39 ` Shane
2007-12-07 22:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-07 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-08 0:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-12-08 0:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-08 2:13 ` Shane
2007-12-08 4:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-08 4:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] proc: Remove/Fix proc generic d_revalidate Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-08 17:15 ` Shane [this message]
2007-12-10 2:52 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-12-10 13:32 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-12-10 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-10 21:35 ` vandrove
2007-12-08 4:39 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-09 0:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-09 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 5:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-10 14:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 14:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 15:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 15:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 18:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:01 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression [SOLVED] Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-12 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-12 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 19:51 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression Shane
2007-12-07 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 22:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa4052ef0712080915o5e76363dvbda41d9394db4b77@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gnome42@gmail.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®