From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
gnome42@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bfields@fieldses.org, "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 21:39:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fxydpzpk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071208000043.GC1951@martell.zuzino.mipt.ru> (Alexey Dobriyan's message of "Sat, 8 Dec 2007 03:00:43 +0300")
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> writes:
> I very much agree. ->shadow_proc is so ugly, so it's not funny anymore.
> Adding such hook for proc part of networking _and_ for modules is just asking
> for trouble as was demonstrated.
Alexey however we do this we fundamentally have to proc_lookup, if
we don't want weird artifacts showing up in user space.
To me the implementation details don't much matter, as long as we
somehow get proc_lookup to do the right thing.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-08 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-07 4:45 Shane
2007-12-07 12:02 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 18:14 ` Shane
2007-12-07 18:36 ` Shane
2007-12-07 18:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 18:55 ` Shane
2007-12-07 19:16 ` Shane
2007-12-07 19:39 ` Shane
2007-12-07 22:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 23:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 23:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-07 23:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-12-08 0:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-12-08 0:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-08 2:13 ` Shane
2007-12-08 4:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-08 4:25 ` [PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] proc: Remove/Fix proc generic d_revalidate Eric W. Biederman
2007-12-08 17:15 ` Shane
2007-12-10 2:52 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-12-10 13:32 ` Denis V. Lunev
2007-12-10 19:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-10 21:35 ` vandrove
2007-12-08 4:39 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2007-12-09 0:20 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-09 19:50 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 5:03 ` Neil Brown
2007-12-10 14:19 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 14:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 15:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 15:47 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-10 18:22 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 21:03 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:01 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression [SOLVED] Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-12 2:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:19 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-12 2:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-12 2:24 ` Maxim Levitsky
2007-12-10 19:51 ` 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression Shane
2007-12-07 22:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-07 22:39 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-12-07 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1fxydpzpk.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=gnome42@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®