* Re: [PATCH v10 2/9] drm/mediatek: Add crtc path enum for all_drm_priv array [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-3-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:21 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Add mtk_drm_crtc_path enum for each display path. > > Instead of using array index of all_drm_priv in mtk_drm_kms_init(), > mtk_drm_crtc_path enum can make code more readable. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-8-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 7/9] drm/mediatek: Support dynamic selection of DP_INTF0 on MT8188 VDOSYS0 [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-8-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:24 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Move DDP_COMPONENT_DP_INTF0 from mt8188_mtk_ddp_main array to a > connector routes array called mt8188_mtk_ddp_main_routes to support > dynamic selection capability for mt8188. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-5-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 4/9] drm/mediatek: Add encoder_index interface for mtk_ddp_comp_funcs [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-5-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:24 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > To support dynamic connector selection function, each ddp_comp need to > get their encoder_index to identify which connector should be selected. > > Add encoder_index interface for mtk_ddp_comp_funcs to get the encoder > identifier by drm_encoder_index(). > Then drm driver will call mtk_ddp_comp_encoder_index_set() to store the > encoder_index to each ddp_comp in connector routes. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-9-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] drm/mediatek: dsi: Support dynamic connector selection [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-9-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:24 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Add implementation of mtk_dsi_encoder_index to mtk_ddp_comp_func > to make mtk_dsi support dynamic connector selection. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-7-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 6/9] drm/mediatek: dpi: Support dynamic connector selection [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-7-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:24 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Add implementation of mtk_dpi_encoder_index to mtk_ddp_comp_func > to make mtk_dpi support dynamic connector selection. > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-10-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 9/9] drm/mediatek: Support dynamic selection of DSI0 on MT8188 VDOSYS0 [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-10-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 9:24 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, Nathan Lu Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Add DDP_COMPONENT_DSI0 as a main display output selection on > MT8188 VDOSYS0. > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lu <nathan.lu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20230927153833.23583-6-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>]
* Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability [not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-6-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> @ 2023-09-28 10:00 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-10-02 7:14 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-09-28 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH.Lin, Chun-Kuang Hu Cc: Matthias Brugger, Jason-ch Chen, Johnson Wang, Singo Chang, Nancy Lin, Shawn Sung, dri-devel, linux-mediatek, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, Nathan Lu Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > Add dynamic select available connector flow in mtk_drm_crtc_create() > and mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(). > > In mtk_drm_crtc_create(), if there is a connector routes array in drm > driver data, all components definded in the connector routes array will > be checked and their encoder_index will be set. > > In mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(), crtc will check its encoder_index to > identify which componet in the connector routes array should append. > > Signed-off-by: Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lu <nathan.lu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h | 5 +- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 27 ++++++- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 13 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 7 ++ > 5 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > index b6fa4ad2f94d..8eb4d2646a76 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc { > struct mtk_mutex *mutex; > unsigned int ddp_comp_nr; > struct mtk_ddp_comp **ddp_comp; > + unsigned int num_conn_routes; > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes; > > /* lock for display hardware access */ > struct mutex hw_lock; > @@ -647,6 +649,45 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > mtk_ddp_comp_disable_vblank(comp); > } > > +static void mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > + struct drm_atomic_state *state) > +{ > + int crtc_index = drm_crtc_index(crtc); > + int i; > + struct device *dev; > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = state->crtcs[crtc_index].new_state; > + struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = to_mtk_crtc(crtc); > + struct mtk_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private; > + unsigned int comp_id; You're not using comp_id globally in this function.... > + unsigned int encoder_mask = crtc_state->encoder_mask; > + > + if (!crtc_state->connectors_changed) > + return; > + > + if (!mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes) > + return; > + > + priv = priv->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; This is a bit confusing. You're reassigning priv: please avoid that. I would prefer directly seeing the final assignment, or otherwise two pointers. struct mtk_drm_private *priv; if .... ........... priv = crtc->dev->dev_private->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; > + dev = priv->dev; > + > + dev_dbg(dev, "connector change:%d, encoder mask:0x%x for crtc:%d\n", > + crtc_state->connectors_changed, encoder_mask, crtc_index); > + > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes; i++) { > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; ...so you can move it here... unsigned int comp_id = mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_ddp; struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > + > + comp_id = mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > + if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && > + encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index)) { For readability, I would prefer to see if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && (encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index))) { ...but I don't have strong opinions on that. > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1] = comp; > + dev_dbg(dev, "Add comp_id: %d at path index %d\n", > + comp->id, mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1); > + break; > + } > + } > +} > + > int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_plane *plane, > struct mtk_plane_state *state) > { > @@ -679,6 +720,8 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s %d\n", __func__, crtc->base.id); > > + mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(crtc, state); > + What's the point of updating the output before pm_runtime_resume_and_get()? If PM resume fails we're not enabling the CRTC so the update is actually useless. Please move this after PM resume: that will also possibly come handy in the future. > ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(comp->dev); > if (ret < 0) { > DRM_DEV_ERROR(comp->dev, "Failed to enable power domain: %d\n", ret); > @@ -884,7 +927,8 @@ struct device *mtk_drm_crtc_dma_dev_get(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > const unsigned int *path, unsigned int path_len, > - int priv_data_index) > + int priv_data_index, const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes, > + unsigned int num_conn_routes) > { > struct mtk_drm_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private; > struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev; > @@ -935,7 +979,8 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > > mtk_crtc->mmsys_dev = priv->mmsys_dev; > mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr = path_len; > - mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr, > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr + (conn_routes ? 1 : 0), > sizeof(*mtk_crtc->ddp_comp), > GFP_KERNEL); > if (!mtk_crtc->ddp_comp) > @@ -1038,5 +1083,34 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > init_waitqueue_head(&mtk_crtc->cb_blocking_queue); > } > #endif > + > + if (conn_routes) { > + struct device_node *node; > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; > + unsigned int comp_id; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_conn_routes; i++) { Same here, you're locally using comp_id, node and comp *only* in the for loop.... unsigned int comp_id = conn_routes[i].route_ddp; struct device_node *node = priv->comp_node[comp_id]; struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > + comp_id = conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > + node = priv->comp_node[comp_id]; > + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > + > + if (!comp->dev) { > + dev_dbg(dev, "comp_id:%d, Component %pOF not initialized\n", > + comp_id, node); > + /* mark encoder_index to -1, if route comp device is not enabled */ > + comp->encoder_index = -1; > + continue; > + } > + > + mtk_ddp_comp_encoder_index_set(&priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]); > + } > + > + mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes = num_conn_routes; > + mtk_crtc->conn_routes = conn_routes; > + > + /* increase ddp_comp_nr at the end of mtk_drm_crtc_create */ > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr++; > + } > + > return 0; > } > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > index 3e9046993d09..3c224595fa71 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > #include <drm/drm_crtc.h> > #include "mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h" > +#include "mtk_drm_drv.h" > #include "mtk_drm_plane.h" > > #define MTK_LUT_SIZE 512 > @@ -18,7 +19,9 @@ void mtk_drm_crtc_commit(struct drm_crtc *crtc); > int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > const unsigned int *path, > unsigned int path_len, > - int priv_data_index); > + int priv_data_index, > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes, > + unsigned int num_conn_routes); > int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_plane *plane, > struct mtk_plane_state *state); > void mtk_drm_crtc_async_update(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_plane *plane, > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > index 771f4e173353..4ddb5e561116 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > @@ -507,6 +507,23 @@ static bool mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(struct device *dev, > return false; > } > > +static int mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(struct device *dev, > + const struct mtk_drm_route *routes, > + unsigned int num_routes, > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *ddp_comp) > +{ > + unsigned int i; > + > + if (!routes) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + for (i = 0; i < num_routes; i++) > + if (dev == ddp_comp[routes[i].route_ddp].dev) > + return BIT(routes[i].crtc_id); > + > + return -ENODEV; > +} > + > int mtk_ddp_comp_get_id(struct device_node *node, > enum mtk_ddp_comp_type comp_type) > { > @@ -538,7 +555,15 @@ unsigned int mtk_drm_find_possible_crtc_by_comp(struct drm_device *drm, > private->data->third_len, private->ddp_comp)) > ret = BIT(2); > else > - DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table\n"); > + ret = mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(dev, > + private->data->conn_routes, > + private->data->num_conn_routes, > + private->ddp_comp); > + > + if (ret <= 0) { > + DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table, ret =%d\n", ret); > + ret = 0; Why are you returning 0 for error here?! > + } > > return ret; > } Regards, Angelo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability 2023-09-28 10:00 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-10-02 7:14 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 2023-10-02 10:23 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) @ 2023-10-02 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: angelogioacchino.delregno, chunkuang.hu Cc: linux-mediatek, Singo Chang (張興國), Johnson Wang (王聖鑫), Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪), Shawn Sung (宋孝謙), linux-kernel, Nancy Lin (林欣螢), dri-devel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, Nathan Lu (呂東霖), linux-arm-kernel, matthias.bgg Hi Angelo, Thanks for the reviews. On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 12:00 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: > > Add dynamic select available connector flow in > > mtk_drm_crtc_create() > > and mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(). > > > > In mtk_drm_crtc_create(), if there is a connector routes array in > > drm > > driver data, all components definded in the connector routes array > > will > > be checked and their encoder_index will be set. > > > > In mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(), crtc will check its encoder_index > > to > > identify which componet in the connector routes array should > > append. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Lu <nathan.lu@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> > > Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 78 > > ++++++++++++++++++++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h | 5 +- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 27 ++++++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 13 +++- > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 7 ++ > > 5 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > > index b6fa4ad2f94d..8eb4d2646a76 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c > > @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc { > > struct mtk_mutex *mutex; > > unsigned int ddp_comp_nr; > > struct mtk_ddp_comp **ddp_comp; > > + unsigned int num_conn_routes; > > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes; > > > > /* lock for display hardware access */ > > struct mutex hw_lock; > > @@ -647,6 +649,45 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc) > > mtk_ddp_comp_disable_vblank(comp); > > } > > > > +static void mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > +{ > > + int crtc_index = drm_crtc_index(crtc); > > + int i; > > + struct device *dev; > > + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = state- > > >crtcs[crtc_index].new_state; > > + struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = to_mtk_crtc(crtc); > > + struct mtk_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private; > > + unsigned int comp_id; > > You're not using comp_id globally in this function.... OK, I'll move it to the for loop below. > > > + unsigned int encoder_mask = crtc_state->encoder_mask; > > + > > + if (!crtc_state->connectors_changed) > > + return; > > + > > + if (!mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes) > > + return; > > + > > + priv = priv->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; > > This is a bit confusing. You're reassigning priv: please avoid that. > I would prefer directly seeing the final assignment, or otherwise two > pointers. > > struct mtk_drm_private *priv; > > if .... > ........... > > priv = crtc->dev->dev_private->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; > OK, because the type of dev_private is void*. I'll change the assignment to: priv = ((struct mtk_drm_private *)crtc->dev->dev_private)- >all_drm_private[crtc_index]; > > + dev = priv->dev; > > + > > + dev_dbg(dev, "connector change:%d, encoder mask:0x%x for > > crtc:%d\n", > > + crtc_state->connectors_changed, encoder_mask, > > crtc_index); > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes; i++) { > > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; > > ...so you can move it here... OK, I'll move it here. > unsigned int comp_id = mtk_crtc- > >conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > > > + > > + comp_id = mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > > + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > > + if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && > > + encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index)) { > > For readability, I would prefer to see > > if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && > (encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index))) { > > ...but I don't have strong opinions on that. > OK, I'll modify it. > > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1] = > > comp; > > + dev_dbg(dev, "Add comp_id: %d at path index > > %d\n", > > + comp->id, mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1); > > + break; > > + } > > + } > > +} > > + > > int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct > > drm_plane *plane, > > struct mtk_plane_state *state) > > { > > @@ -679,6 +720,8 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s %d\n", __func__, crtc->base.id); > > > > + mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(crtc, state); > > + > > What's the point of updating the output before > pm_runtime_resume_and_get()? > If PM resume fails we're not enabling the CRTC so the update is > actually useless. > > Please move this after PM resume: that will also possibly come handy > in the future. OK, I'll move this after pm_runtime_resume_and_get(). > > > > ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(comp->dev); > > if (ret < 0) { > > DRM_DEV_ERROR(comp->dev, "Failed to enable power > > domain: %d\n", ret); > > @@ -884,7 +927,8 @@ struct device *mtk_drm_crtc_dma_dev_get(struct > > drm_crtc *crtc) > > > > int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > > const unsigned int *path, unsigned int > > path_len, > > - int priv_data_index) > > + int priv_data_index, const struct mtk_drm_route > > *conn_routes, > > + unsigned int num_conn_routes) > > { > > struct mtk_drm_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private; > > struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev; > > @@ -935,7 +979,8 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device > > *drm_dev, > > > > mtk_crtc->mmsys_dev = priv->mmsys_dev; > > mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr = path_len; > > - mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, mtk_crtc- > > >ddp_comp_nr, > > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, > > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr + > > (conn_routes ? 1 : 0), > > sizeof(*mtk_crtc- > > >ddp_comp), > > GFP_KERNEL); > > if (!mtk_crtc->ddp_comp) > > @@ -1038,5 +1083,34 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device > > *drm_dev, > > init_waitqueue_head(&mtk_crtc->cb_blocking_queue); > > } > > #endif > > + > > + if (conn_routes) { > > + struct device_node *node; > > + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; > > + unsigned int comp_id; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_conn_routes; i++) { > > Same here, you're locally using comp_id, node and comp *only* in the > for loop.... > OK I'll move it here. > unsigned int comp_id = > conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > struct device_node *node = priv- > >comp_node[comp_id]; > struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv- > >ddp_comp[comp_id]; > > > + comp_id = conn_routes[i].route_ddp; > > + node = priv->comp_node[comp_id]; > > + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; > > + > > + if (!comp->dev) { > > + dev_dbg(dev, "comp_id:%d, Component > > %pOF not initialized\n", > > + comp_id, node); > > + /* mark encoder_index to -1, if route > > comp device is not enabled */ > > + comp->encoder_index = -1; > > + continue; > > + } > > + > > + mtk_ddp_comp_encoder_index_set(&priv- > > >ddp_comp[comp_id]); > > + } > > + > > + mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes = num_conn_routes; > > + mtk_crtc->conn_routes = conn_routes; > > + > > + /* increase ddp_comp_nr at the end of > > mtk_drm_crtc_create */ > > + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr++; > > + } > > + > > return 0; > > } > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > > index 3e9046993d09..3c224595fa71 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h > > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > > > > #include <drm/drm_crtc.h> > > #include "mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h" > > +#include "mtk_drm_drv.h" > > #include "mtk_drm_plane.h" > > > > #define MTK_LUT_SIZE 512 > > @@ -18,7 +19,9 @@ void mtk_drm_crtc_commit(struct drm_crtc *crtc); > > int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, > > const unsigned int *path, > > unsigned int path_len, > > - int priv_data_index); > > + int priv_data_index, > > + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes, > > + unsigned int num_conn_routes); > > int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct > > drm_plane *plane, > > struct mtk_plane_state *state); > > void mtk_drm_crtc_async_update(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct > > drm_plane *plane, > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > index 771f4e173353..4ddb5e561116 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c > > @@ -507,6 +507,23 @@ static bool mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(struct > > device *dev, > > return false; > > } > > > > +static int mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(struct device *dev, > > + const struct > > mtk_drm_route *routes, > > + unsigned int num_routes, > > + struct mtk_ddp_comp > > *ddp_comp) > > +{ > > + unsigned int i; > > + > > + if (!routes) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_routes; i++) > > + if (dev == ddp_comp[routes[i].route_ddp].dev) > > + return BIT(routes[i].crtc_id); > > + > > + return -ENODEV; > > +} > > + > > int mtk_ddp_comp_get_id(struct device_node *node, > > enum mtk_ddp_comp_type comp_type) > > { > > @@ -538,7 +555,15 @@ unsigned int > > mtk_drm_find_possible_crtc_by_comp(struct drm_device *drm, > > private->data->third_len, > > private->ddp_comp)) > > ret = BIT(2); > > else > > - DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table\n"); > > + ret = mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(dev, > > + private->data- > > >conn_routes, > > + private->data- > > >num_conn_routes, > > + private- > > >ddp_comp); > > + > > + if (ret <= 0) { > > + DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table, ret =%d\n", > > ret); > > + ret = 0; > > Why are you returning 0 for error here?! Because this function return 0 means not found any valid crtc bits. Should I change this? Regards, Jason-JH.Lin > > > + } > > > > return ret; > > } > > Regards, > Angelo > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability 2023-10-02 7:14 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) @ 2023-10-02 10:23 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 2023-10-03 3:34 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-10-02 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥), chunkuang.hu Cc: linux-mediatek, Singo Chang (張興國), Johnson Wang (王聖鑫), Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪), Shawn Sung (宋孝謙), linux-kernel, Nancy Lin (林欣螢), dri-devel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, Nathan Lu (呂東霖), linux-arm-kernel, matthias.bgg Il 02/10/23 09:14, Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) ha scritto: > Hi Angelo, > > Thanks for the reviews. > > On Thu, 2023-09-28 at 12:00 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> Il 27/09/23 17:38, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto: >>> Add dynamic select available connector flow in >>> mtk_drm_crtc_create() >>> and mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(). >>> >>> In mtk_drm_crtc_create(), if there is a connector routes array in >>> drm >>> driver data, all components definded in the connector routes array >>> will >>> be checked and their encoder_index will be set. >>> >>> In mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(), crtc will check its encoder_index >>> to >>> identify which componet in the connector routes array should >>> append. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nancy Lin <nancy.lin@mediatek.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Lu <nathan.lu@mediatek.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com> >>> Tested-by: Fei Shao <fshao@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 78 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h | 5 +- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 27 ++++++- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 13 +++- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 7 ++ >>> 5 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c >>> index b6fa4ad2f94d..8eb4d2646a76 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c >>> @@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct mtk_drm_crtc { >>> struct mtk_mutex *mutex; >>> unsigned int ddp_comp_nr; >>> struct mtk_ddp_comp **ddp_comp; >>> + unsigned int num_conn_routes; >>> + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes; >>> >>> /* lock for display hardware access */ >>> struct mutex hw_lock; >>> @@ -647,6 +649,45 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_disable_vblank(struct >>> drm_crtc *crtc) >>> mtk_ddp_comp_disable_vblank(comp); >>> } >>> >>> +static void mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >>> + struct drm_atomic_state *state) >>> +{ >>> + int crtc_index = drm_crtc_index(crtc); >>> + int i; >>> + struct device *dev; >>> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = state- >>>> crtcs[crtc_index].new_state; >>> + struct mtk_drm_crtc *mtk_crtc = to_mtk_crtc(crtc); >>> + struct mtk_drm_private *priv = crtc->dev->dev_private; >>> + unsigned int comp_id; >> >> You're not using comp_id globally in this function.... > > OK, I'll move it to the for loop below. > >> >>> + unsigned int encoder_mask = crtc_state->encoder_mask; >>> + >>> + if (!crtc_state->connectors_changed) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + if (!mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + priv = priv->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; >> >> This is a bit confusing. You're reassigning priv: please avoid that. >> I would prefer directly seeing the final assignment, or otherwise two >> pointers. >> >> struct mtk_drm_private *priv; >> >> if .... >> ........... >> >> priv = crtc->dev->dev_private->all_drm_private[crtc_index]; >> > > OK, because the type of dev_private is void*. I'll change the > assignment to: > > priv = ((struct mtk_drm_private *)crtc->dev->dev_private)- >> all_drm_private[crtc_index]; > >>> + dev = priv->dev; >>> + >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "connector change:%d, encoder mask:0x%x for >>> crtc:%d\n", >>> + crtc_state->connectors_changed, encoder_mask, >>> crtc_index); >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes; i++) { >>> + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; >> >> ...so you can move it here... > > OK, I'll move it here. > >> unsigned int comp_id = mtk_crtc- >>> conn_routes[i].route_ddp; >> struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; >> >>> + >>> + comp_id = mtk_crtc->conn_routes[i].route_ddp; >>> + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; >>> + if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && >>> + encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index)) { >> >> For readability, I would prefer to see >> >> if (comp->encoder_index >= 0 && >> (encoder_mask & BIT(comp->encoder_index))) { >> >> ...but I don't have strong opinions on that. >> > > OK, I'll modify it. > >>> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp[mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1] = >>> comp; >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "Add comp_id: %d at path index >>> %d\n", >>> + comp->id, mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr - 1); >>> + break; >>> + } >>> + } >>> +} >>> + >>> int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct >>> drm_plane *plane, >>> struct mtk_plane_state *state) >>> { >>> @@ -679,6 +720,8 @@ static void mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_enable(struct >>> drm_crtc *crtc, >>> >>> DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("%s %d\n", __func__, crtc->base.id); >>> >>> + mtk_drm_crtc_update_output(crtc, state); >>> + >> >> What's the point of updating the output before >> pm_runtime_resume_and_get()? >> If PM resume fails we're not enabling the CRTC so the update is >> actually useless. >> >> Please move this after PM resume: that will also possibly come handy >> in the future. > > OK, I'll move this after pm_runtime_resume_and_get(). > >> >> >>> ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(comp->dev); >>> if (ret < 0) { >>> DRM_DEV_ERROR(comp->dev, "Failed to enable power >>> domain: %d\n", ret); >>> @@ -884,7 +927,8 @@ struct device *mtk_drm_crtc_dma_dev_get(struct >>> drm_crtc *crtc) >>> >>> int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, >>> const unsigned int *path, unsigned int >>> path_len, >>> - int priv_data_index) >>> + int priv_data_index, const struct mtk_drm_route >>> *conn_routes, >>> + unsigned int num_conn_routes) >>> { >>> struct mtk_drm_private *priv = drm_dev->dev_private; >>> struct device *dev = drm_dev->dev; >>> @@ -935,7 +979,8 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device >>> *drm_dev, >>> >>> mtk_crtc->mmsys_dev = priv->mmsys_dev; >>> mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr = path_len; >>> - mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, mtk_crtc- >>>> ddp_comp_nr, >>> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp = devm_kmalloc_array(dev, >>> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr + >>> (conn_routes ? 1 : 0), >>> sizeof(*mtk_crtc- >>>> ddp_comp), >>> GFP_KERNEL); >>> if (!mtk_crtc->ddp_comp) >>> @@ -1038,5 +1083,34 @@ int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device >>> *drm_dev, >>> init_waitqueue_head(&mtk_crtc->cb_blocking_queue); >>> } >>> #endif >>> + >>> + if (conn_routes) { >>> + struct device_node *node; >>> + struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp; >>> + unsigned int comp_id; >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < num_conn_routes; i++) { >> >> Same here, you're locally using comp_id, node and comp *only* in the >> for loop.... >> > > OK I'll move it here. > >> unsigned int comp_id = >> conn_routes[i].route_ddp; >> struct device_node *node = priv- >>> comp_node[comp_id]; >> struct mtk_ddp_comp *comp = &priv- >>> ddp_comp[comp_id]; >> >>> + comp_id = conn_routes[i].route_ddp; >>> + node = priv->comp_node[comp_id]; >>> + comp = &priv->ddp_comp[comp_id]; >>> + >>> + if (!comp->dev) { >>> + dev_dbg(dev, "comp_id:%d, Component >>> %pOF not initialized\n", >>> + comp_id, node); >>> + /* mark encoder_index to -1, if route >>> comp device is not enabled */ >>> + comp->encoder_index = -1; >>> + continue; >>> + } >>> + >>> + mtk_ddp_comp_encoder_index_set(&priv- >>>> ddp_comp[comp_id]); >>> + } >>> + >>> + mtk_crtc->num_conn_routes = num_conn_routes; >>> + mtk_crtc->conn_routes = conn_routes; >>> + >>> + /* increase ddp_comp_nr at the end of >>> mtk_drm_crtc_create */ >>> + mtk_crtc->ddp_comp_nr++; >>> + } >>> + >>> return 0; >>> } >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h >>> index 3e9046993d09..3c224595fa71 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.h >>> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >>> >>> #include <drm/drm_crtc.h> >>> #include "mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h" >>> +#include "mtk_drm_drv.h" >>> #include "mtk_drm_plane.h" >>> >>> #define MTK_LUT_SIZE 512 >>> @@ -18,7 +19,9 @@ void mtk_drm_crtc_commit(struct drm_crtc *crtc); >>> int mtk_drm_crtc_create(struct drm_device *drm_dev, >>> const unsigned int *path, >>> unsigned int path_len, >>> - int priv_data_index); >>> + int priv_data_index, >>> + const struct mtk_drm_route *conn_routes, >>> + unsigned int num_conn_routes); >>> int mtk_drm_crtc_plane_check(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct >>> drm_plane *plane, >>> struct mtk_plane_state *state); >>> void mtk_drm_crtc_async_update(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct >>> drm_plane *plane, >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c >>> index 771f4e173353..4ddb5e561116 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c >>> @@ -507,6 +507,23 @@ static bool mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp(struct >>> device *dev, >>> return false; >>> } >>> >>> +static int mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(struct device *dev, >>> + const struct >>> mtk_drm_route *routes, >>> + unsigned int num_routes, >>> + struct mtk_ddp_comp >>> *ddp_comp) >>> +{ >>> + unsigned int i; >>> + >>> + if (!routes) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + >>> + for (i = 0; i < num_routes; i++) >>> + if (dev == ddp_comp[routes[i].route_ddp].dev) >>> + return BIT(routes[i].crtc_id); >>> + >>> + return -ENODEV; >>> +} >>> + >>> int mtk_ddp_comp_get_id(struct device_node *node, >>> enum mtk_ddp_comp_type comp_type) >>> { >>> @@ -538,7 +555,15 @@ unsigned int >>> mtk_drm_find_possible_crtc_by_comp(struct drm_device *drm, >>> private->data->third_len, >>> private->ddp_comp)) >>> ret = BIT(2); >>> else >>> - DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table\n"); >>> + ret = mtk_drm_find_comp_in_ddp_conn_path(dev, >>> + private->data- >>>> conn_routes, >>> + private->data- >>>> num_conn_routes, >>> + private- >>>> ddp_comp); >>> + >>> + if (ret <= 0) { >>> + DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table, ret =%d\n", >>> ret); >>> + ret = 0; >> >> Why are you returning 0 for error here?! > > Because this function return 0 means not found any valid crtc bits. > Should I change this? > Yes, please, return a relevant error code instead. Thanks, Angelo > Regards, > Jason-JH.Lin > >> >>> + } >>> >>> return ret; >>> } >> >> Regards, >> Angelo >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability 2023-10-02 10:23 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno @ 2023-10-03 3:34 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) @ 2023-10-03 3:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: angelogioacchino.delregno, chunkuang.hu Cc: linux-mediatek, linux-kernel, Singo Chang (張興國), Johnson Wang (王聖鑫), Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪), Shawn Sung (宋孝謙), Nancy Lin (林欣螢), dri-devel, Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group, Nathan Lu (呂東霖), linux-arm-kernel, matthias.bgg Hi Angelo, Thanks for the reviews. [snip] > > > > > > > > + > > > > + if (ret <= 0) { > > > > + DRM_INFO("Failed to find comp in ddp table, ret > > > > =%d\n", > > > > ret); > > > > + ret = 0; > > > > > > Why are you returning 0 for error here?! > > > > Because this function return 0 means not found any valid crtc bits. > > Should I change this? > > > > Yes, please, return a relevant error code instead. > I found that the return type of this function is 'unsigned int', I think returning error code instead will change the original behavior of returning 0 as not finding any possible crtc. e.g. drm_encoder_ok() in drm_encoder.h will check: !!(encoder->possible_crtcs & drm_crtc_mask(crtc)) The negative error code convert to unsigned int will be a huge number and that may cause the unexpected result here. Regards, Jason-JH.Lin > Thanks, > Angelo > > > Regards, > > Jason-JH.Lin > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > return ret; > > > > } > > > > > > Regards, > > > Angelo > > > > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-10-03 3:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20230927153833.23583-1-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-3-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:21 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] drm/mediatek: Add crtc path enum for all_drm_priv array AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-8-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] drm/mediatek: Support dynamic selection of DP_INTF0 on MT8188 VDOSYS0 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-5-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] drm/mediatek: Add encoder_index interface for mtk_ddp_comp_funcs AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-9-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] drm/mediatek: dsi: Support dynamic connector selection AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-7-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] drm/mediatek: dpi: " AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-10-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 9:24 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] drm/mediatek: Support dynamic selection of DSI0 on MT8188 VDOSYS0 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
[not found] ` <20230927153833.23583-6-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com>
2023-09-28 10:00 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] drm/mediatek: Add connector dynamic selection capability AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-10-02 7:14 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
2023-10-02 10:23 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2023-10-03 3:34 ` Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®