* [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
[not found] <177745671692.1474915.5018486129724109553@noble.neil.brown.name>
@ 2026-04-29 10:49 ` Igor Raits
2026-05-13 7:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Igor Raits @ 2026-04-29 10:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker
Cc: NeilBrown, Jan Čípa, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, stable
After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE issued by
mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries. When the retry
succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -EEXIST to userspace
even though the directory was just created on the server.
Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the cause)
against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both NFSv4.0 and
NFSv4.2:
N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export
for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8)
mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d"
rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null
done
Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/export
cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY for CREATE.
A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come from a
single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY
~100 ms later
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK (dir created)
~80 us later
client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number
NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"), nfs4_handle_exception() is called only
when _nfs4_proc_mkdir() returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state
hygiene: nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what previously
cleared the retry flag set by the preceding NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration.
With the gate in place, exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful
retry, the loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an
already-created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception() unconditionally,
matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(),
nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The dentry/status separation introduced by
that commit is preserved.
Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()")
Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
do {
alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr, label, &err);
trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err);
+ err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
if (err)
- alias = ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
- err,
- &exception));
+ alias = ERR_PTR(err);
} while (exception.retry);
nfs4_label_release_security(label);
--
2.53.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
2026-04-29 10:49 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry Igor Raits
@ 2026-05-13 7:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-06-09 10:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2026-05-13 7:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker
Cc: NeilBrown, Jan Čípa, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, stable,
Igor Raits, Linux kernel regressions list
[top-posting to facilitate processing]
@NFSv4 maintainers, just wondering, did this patch maybe fall through
the cracks? It fixes a regression, that's why it's on my radar. Or was
there some progress and I missed it?
Ciao, Thorsten
On 4/29/26 12:49, Igor Raits wrote:
> After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE issued by
> mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries. When the retry
> succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -EEXIST to userspace
> even though the directory was just created on the server.
>
> Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the cause)
> against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both NFSv4.0 and
> NFSv4.2:
>
> N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export
> for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
> d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8)
> mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d"
> rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null
> done
>
> Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/export
> cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY for CREATE.
>
> A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come from a
> single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
>
> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY
> ~100 ms later
> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK (dir created)
> ~80 us later
> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
>
> Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number
> NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"), nfs4_handle_exception() is called only
> when _nfs4_proc_mkdir() returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state
> hygiene: nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
> retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what previously
> cleared the retry flag set by the preceding NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration.
> With the gate in place, exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful
> retry, the loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an
> already-created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
>
> Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception() unconditionally,
> matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(),
> nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The dentry/status separation introduced by
> that commit is preserved.
>
> Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()")
> Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
> do {
> alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr, label, &err);
> trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err);
> + err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
> if (err)
> - alias = ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
> - err,
> - &exception));
> + alias = ERR_PTR(err);
> } while (exception.retry);
> nfs4_label_release_security(label);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
2026-05-13 7:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2026-06-09 10:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-06-10 14:28 ` Anna Schumaker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2026-06-09 10:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Trond Myklebust, NeilBrown, Anna Schumaker, Igor Raits
Cc: Jan Čípa, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, stable,
Linux kernel regressions list
On 5/13/26 09:18, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> [top-posting to facilitate processing]
>
> @NFSv4 maintainers, just wondering, did this patch maybe fall through
> the cracks? It fixes a regression, that's why it's on my radar. Or was
> there some progress and I missed it?
Still no progress afaics. Feels like I'm missing something obvious or
like I'm totally of track.
Igor, Neil, is that the case? Or are you also waiting for the fix to
make progress?
Ciao, Thorsten
> On 4/29/26 12:49, Igor Raits wrote:
>> After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE issued by
>> mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries. When the retry
>> succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -EEXIST to userspace
>> even though the directory was just created on the server.
>>
>> Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the cause)
>> against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both NFSv4.0 and
>> NFSv4.2:
>>
>> N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export
>> for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
>> d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8)
>> mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d"
>> rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null
>> done
>>
>> Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/export
>> cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY for CREATE.
>>
>> A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come from a
>> single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
>>
>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY
>> ~100 ms later
>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK (dir created)
>> ~80 us later
>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
>>
>> Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number
>> NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"), nfs4_handle_exception() is called only
>> when _nfs4_proc_mkdir() returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state
>> hygiene: nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
>> retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what previously
>> cleared the retry flag set by the preceding NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration.
>> With the gate in place, exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful
>> retry, the loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an
>> already-created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
>>
>> Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception() unconditionally,
>> matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(),
>> nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The dentry/status separation introduced by
>> that commit is preserved.
>>
>> Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()")
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
>> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> index a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>> @@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>> do {
>> alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr, label, &err);
>> trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err);
>> + err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
>> if (err)
>> - alias = ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
>> - err,
>> - &exception));
>> + alias = ERR_PTR(err);
>> } while (exception.retry);
>> nfs4_label_release_security(label);
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
2026-06-09 10:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
@ 2026-06-10 14:28 ` Anna Schumaker
2026-06-10 16:12 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anna Schumaker @ 2026-06-10 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thorsten Leemhuis, Trond Myklebust, NeilBrown, Igor Raits
Cc: Jan Čípa, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, stable,
Linux kernel regressions list
Hi Thorsten,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2026, at 6:05 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 5/13/26 09:18, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> [top-posting to facilitate processing]
>>
>> @NFSv4 maintainers, just wondering, did this patch maybe fall through
>> the cracks? It fixes a regression, that's why it's on my radar. Or was
>> there some progress and I missed it?
The patch is in my linux-next branch here: https://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=anna/linux-nfs.git;a=commit;h=238e9b51aa29f48b6243212a3b75c8e48d6b96fd
It'll be included when the merge window opens this weekend.
Anna
>
> Still no progress afaics. Feels like I'm missing something obvious or
> like I'm totally of track.
>
> Igor, Neil, is that the case? Or are you also waiting for the fix to
> make progress?
>
> Ciao, Thorsten
>
>> On 4/29/26 12:49, Igor Raits wrote:
>>> After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE issued by
>>> mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries. When the retry
>>> succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -EEXIST to userspace
>>> even though the directory was just created on the server.
>>>
>>> Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the cause)
>>> against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both NFSv4.0 and
>>> NFSv4.2:
>>>
>>> N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export
>>> for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
>>> d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8)
>>> mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d"
>>> rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null
>>> done
>>>
>>> Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/export
>>> cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY for CREATE.
>>>
>>> A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come from a
>>> single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
>>>
>>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY
>>> ~100 ms later
>>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK (dir created)
>>> ~80 us later
>>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
>>>
>>> Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number
>>> NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"), nfs4_handle_exception() is called only
>>> when _nfs4_proc_mkdir() returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state
>>> hygiene: nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
>>> retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what previously
>>> cleared the retry flag set by the preceding NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration.
>>> With the gate in place, exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful
>>> retry, the loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an
>>> already-created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
>>>
>>> Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception() unconditionally,
>>> matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(),
>>> nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The dentry/status separation introduced by
>>> that commit is preserved.
>>>
>>> Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()")
>>> Reported-and-tested-by: Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
>>> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Igor Raits <igor.raits@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> index a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644
>>> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
>>> @@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
>>> do {
>>> alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr, label, &err);
>>> trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err);
>>> + err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
>>> if (err)
>>> - alias = ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir),
>>> - err,
>>> - &exception));
>>> + alias = ERR_PTR(err);
>>> } while (exception.retry);
>>> nfs4_label_release_security(label);
>>>
>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry
2026-06-10 14:28 ` Anna Schumaker
@ 2026-06-10 16:12 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Leemhuis @ 2026-06-10 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anna Schumaker, Trond Myklebust, NeilBrown, Igor Raits
Cc: Jan Čípa, linux-nfs, linux-kernel, stable,
Linux kernel regressions list
On 6/10/26 16:28, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2026, at 6:05 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 5/13/26 09:18, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> [top-posting to facilitate processing]
>>>
>>> @NFSv4 maintainers, just wondering, did this patch maybe fall
>>> through the cracks? It fixes a regression, that's why it's on my
>>> radar. Or was there some progress and I missed it?
>
> The patch is in my linux-next branch here: https://git.linux-
> nfs.org/?p=anna/linux-
> nfs.git;a=commit;h=238e9b51aa29f48b6243212a3b75c8e48d6b96fd
>
> It'll be included when the merge window opens this weekend.
Great, thx Anna. Was a bit confused why I could not see in -next 90
minutes ago (that where I checked yesterday before prodding, too), but
it turned up there in the new -next release that was published a few
minutes ago. :-D
Ciao, Thorsten
>> Still no progress afaics. Feels like I'm missing something obvious
>> or like I'm totally of track.
>>
>> Igor, Neil, is that the case? Or are you also waiting for the fix
>> to make progress?
>>
>> Ciao, Thorsten
>>
>>> On 4/29/26 12:49, Igor Raits wrote:
>>>> After a server returns NFS4ERR_DELAY for an NFSv4 CREATE
>>>> issued by mkdir(2), the client correctly waits and retries.
>>>> When the retry succeeds, however, mkdir(2) can still surface -
>>>> EEXIST to userspace even though the directory was just created
>>>> on the server.
>>>>
>>>> Reproducer (random 16-hex names so collisions are not the
>>>> cause) against an in-kernel Linux nfsd; reproduces under both
>>>> NFSv4.0 and NFSv4.2:
>>>>
>>>> N=2000000; base=/var/gdc/export for ((i=1; i<=N; i++)); do
>>>> d=$base/$(openssl rand -hex 8) mkdir "$d" 2>/dev/null || echo
>>>> "$(date +%T) failed loop=$i $d" rmdir "$d" 2>/dev/null done
>>>>
>>>> Failures cluster at the cadence at which the server-side auth/
>>>> export cache refresh path causes nfsd to return NFS4ERR_DELAY
>>>> for CREATE.
>>>>
>>>> A wire trace of one failure (the three CREATE RPCs all come
>>>> from a single mkdir(2), generated by the do-while in
>>>> nfs4_proc_mkdir()):
>>>>
>>>> client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4ERR_DELAY ~100 ms
>>>> later client -> server CREATE name=... -> NFS4_OK
>>>> (dir created) ~80 us later client -> server CREATE name=... -
>>>> > NFS4ERR_EXIST (correct)
>>>>
>>>> Since commit dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of
>>>> large-number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()"),
>>>> nfs4_handle_exception() is called only when _nfs4_proc_mkdir()
>>>> returned an error. That gate breaks retry-state hygiene:
>>>> nfs4_do_handle_exception() resets exception.{delay,recovering,
>>>> retry} to 0 on entry, so calling it on success is what
>>>> previously cleared the retry flag set by the preceding
>>>> NFS4ERR_DELAY iteration. With the gate in place,
>>>> exception.retry stays at 1 after the successful retry, the
>>>> loop runs once more, and the resulting CREATE for an already-
>>>> created name yields NFS4ERR_EXIST -> -EEXIST to userspace.
>>>>
>>>> Drop the conditional and call nfs4_handle_exception()
>>>> unconditionally, matching every other do-while in fs/nfs/
>>>> nfs4proc.c (nfs4_proc_symlink(), nfs4_proc_link(), etc.). The
>>>> dentry/status separation introduced by that commit is
>>>> preserved.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: dd862da61e91 ("nfs: fix incorrect handling of large-
>>>> number NFS errors in nfs4_do_mkdir()") Reported-and-tested-by:
>>>> Jan Čípa <jan.cipa@gooddata.com> Closes: https://
>>>> lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/
>>>> CA+9S74hSp_tJu2Ffe2BPNC2T25gfkhgjjDkdgSsF5c2rnJq_wA@mail.gmail.com/
>>>> Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name> Cc:
>>>> stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Igor Raits
>>>> <igor.raits@gmail.com> --- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file
>>>> changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index
>>>> a0885ae55abc..ffd14141ea1d 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++
>>>> b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -5393,10 +5393,9 @@ static struct
>>>> dentry *nfs4_proc_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry
>>>> *dentry, do { alias = _nfs4_proc_mkdir(dir, dentry, sattr,
>>>> label, &err); trace_nfs4_mkdir(dir, &dentry->d_name, err); +
>>>> err = nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), err, &exception);
>>>> if (err) - alias =
>>>> ERR_PTR(nfs4_handle_exception(NFS_SERVER(dir), -
>>>> err, - &exception)); + alias = ERR_PTR(err); }
>>>> while (exception.retry); nfs4_label_release_security(label);
>>>>
>>>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-10 16:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <177745671692.1474915.5018486129724109553@noble.neil.brown.name>
2026-04-29 10:49 ` [PATCH] NFSv4: clear exception state on successful mkdir retry Igor Raits
2026-05-13 7:18 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-06-09 10:05 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2026-06-10 14:28 ` Anna Schumaker
2026-06-10 16:12 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®