[PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[Abel Vesa]

Recently, on Eliza, the CX has been tied up to the GCC.
This leads to dt-bindings check failing.

So the schema needs to be fixed. But the schema is same
for Milos. So instead of adding an if-clause for Eliza only,
tie the CX power domain to the GCC on Milos as well, for the
same exact reasons as on Eliza.

Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Abel Vesa (2):
      dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property
      arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml | 7 +++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi                         | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
---
base-commit: e77a5a5cfe43b4c25bd44a3818e487033287517f
change-id: 20260327-dt-fix-milos-eliza-gcc-power-domains-bdc66ad5d982

Best regards,
--  
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>

[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

[Abel Vesa]

In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.

Document the missing power-domains property to that purpose.

Fixes: 95ba6820a665 ("dt-bindings: clock: qcom: document the Milos Global Clock Controller")
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml
index 60f1c8ca2c13..c65a6ad893d2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,milos-gcc.yaml
@@ -35,9 +35,14 @@ properties:
       - description: UFS Phy Tx symbol 0 clock source
       - description: USB3 Phy wrapper pipe clock source
 
+  power-domains:
+    items:
+      - description: CX domain
+
 required:
   - compatible
   - clocks
+  - power-domains
   - '#power-domain-cells'
 
 allOf:
@@ -48,6 +53,7 @@ unevaluatedProperties: false
 examples:
   - |
     #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
+    #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
     clock-controller@100000 {
         compatible = "qcom,milos-gcc";
         reg = <0x00100000 0x1f4200>;
@@ -59,6 +65,7 @@ examples:
                  <&ufs_mem_phy 1>,
                  <&ufs_mem_phy 2>,
                  <&usb_1_qmpphy>;
+        power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;
         #clock-cells = <1>;
         #reset-cells = <1>;
         #power-domain-cells = <1>;

-- 
2.48.1

[PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[Abel Vesa]

Unless CX is declared as the power-domain of GCC, votes (power and
performance) on the GDSCs it provides will not propagate to the CX,
which might result in under-voltage conditions.

Add the missing power-domains property to associate GCC with RPMHPD_CX.

Fixes: d9d59d105f98 ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add initial Milos dtsi")
Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
index 67f8ef4d524a..eec82a69ddc2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi
@@ -804,6 +804,8 @@ gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
 				 <&ufs_mem_phy 2>,
 				 <0>; /* usb3_phy_wrapper_gcc_usb30_pipe_clk */
 
+			power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_CX>;
+
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
 			#reset-cells = <1>;
 			#power-domain-cells = <1>;

-- 
2.48.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 3/27/26 1:13 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Unless CX is declared as the power-domain of GCC, votes (power and
> performance) on the GDSCs it provides will not propagate to the CX,
> which might result in under-voltage conditions.
> 
> Add the missing power-domains property to associate GCC with RPMHPD_CX.
> 
> Fixes: d9d59d105f98 ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add initial Milos dtsi")
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>

Konrad

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 27/03/2026 13:13, Abel Vesa wrote:
> In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
> to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.

I assume this is true for Milos, not only Eliza.

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

[Abel Vesa]

On 26-03-27 14:37:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/03/2026 13:13, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
> > to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.
> 
> I assume this is true for Milos, not only Eliza.

My understanding of it is that this is true for all platforms.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@oss.qualcomm.com>

Thanks for reviewing!

Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 02:13:41PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Unless CX is declared as the power-domain of GCC, votes (power and
> performance) on the GDSCs it provides will not propagate to the CX,
> which might result in under-voltage conditions.
> 
> Add the missing power-domains property to associate GCC with RPMHPD_CX.
> 
> Fixes: d9d59d105f98 ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add initial Milos dtsi")
> Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/milos.dtsi | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: Add missing power-domains property

[Konrad Dybcio]

On 3/27/26 2:45 PM, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 26-03-27 14:37:17, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 27/03/2026 13:13, Abel Vesa wrote:
>>> In order for the GCC votes on the GDSCs it provides to be propagated
>>> to CX, CX needs to be declared as power domain of the GCC.
>>
>> I assume this is true for Milos, not only Eliza.
> 
> My understanding of it is that this is true for all platforms.

I think we once had

required:
  - power-domains

in some common include, but that expectation fell apart as IPQ/router
platforms without RPM/RPMH started coming up. Maybe splitting gcc.yaml
into gcc.yaml and gcc-no-rpm.yaml or something could be useful to ensure
this common constraint

Konrad

Re: (subset) [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Fri, 27 Mar 2026 14:13:39 +0200, Abel Vesa wrote:
> Recently, on Eliza, the CX has been tied up to the GCC.
> This leads to dt-bindings check failing.
> 
> So the schema needs to be fixed. But the schema is same
> for Milos. So instead of adding an if-clause for Eliza only,
> tie the CX power domain to the GCC on Milos as well, for the
> same exact reasons as on Eliza.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: milos: Add missing CX power domain to GCC
      commit: e46b48b853122626806d989d5db4ce97eaaac2ca

Best regards,
-- 
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>