From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: guest_memfd: Check mmap support when preparing memslot
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 15:21:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbc33983-cb8a-48e4-854f-ce009cc5668f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111145758.217946-3-steven.price@arm.com>
On 11/11/2026 14:57, Steven Price wrote:
> Check the guest_memfd backing file when deciding whether an arm64
> memslot has mappable memory rather than checking whether the slot is
> gmem only. A public helper function is added to be able to reuse the
> static kvm_gmem_supports_mmap() function.
>
Please could you explain why we need this ? Why not rely on
kvm_memslot_is_gmem_only(), which already tells kvm_gmem_supports_mmap()
? With inplace conversion support gmem supports mmap.
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - New patch in v2. Check the guest_memfd backing file rather than the
> memslot flag when deciding whether arm64 can map the backing memory.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 7 ++++---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 1db10d8d6db7..a146f6cde3d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2839,10 +2839,11 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> return -EFAULT;
>
> /*
> - * Only support guest_memfd backed memslots with mappable memory, since
> - * there aren't any CoCo VMs that support only private memory on arm64.
> + * Protected VMs currently require guest_memfd backed memslots with
> + * mappable memory to support shared mappings.
> */
> - if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(new) && !kvm_memslot_is_gmem_only(new))
> + if (kvm_arch_has_private_mem(kvm) && kvm_slot_has_gmem(new) &&
> + !kvm_gmem_slot_supports_mmap(new))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /* guest_memfd is incompatible with MTE. */
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index e7fc94e2910a..f65728a713ec 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -2614,6 +2614,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_is_private_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GUEST_MEMFD
> bool kvm_gmem_is_private_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn);
> +bool kvm_gmem_slot_supports_mmap(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
> bool kvm_arch_supports_gmem_init_shared(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> static inline u64 kvm_gmem_get_supported_flags(struct kvm *kvm)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index 8c97a69b16dc..3dd8d227bebb 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -442,6 +442,12 @@ static bool kvm_gmem_supports_mmap(struct inode *inode)
> return GMEM_I(inode)->flags & GUEST_MEMFD_FLAG_MMAP;
> }
>
> +bool kvm_gmem_slot_supports_mmap(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
> +{
> + /* The guest_memfd file is pinned while preparing a new memslot. */
We should gate this on kvm_slot_has_gmem() and how do we ensure that the
call comes after it is prepared ?
> + return kvm_gmem_supports_mmap(file_inode(slot->gmem.file));
> +}
> +
> static vm_fault_t kvm_gmem_fault_user_mapping(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file_inode(vmf->vma->vm_file);
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 15:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 14:57 [PATCH v2 00/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prepare Realm memory management Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Reserve the RMM mode Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] KVM: arm64: guest_memfd: Check mmap support when preparing memslot Steven Price
2026-11-11 15:21 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Introduce Realms Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Check RMI support and features at init Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] KVM: arm64: Handle attributes in stage2_unmap_range Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Tear down RTTs Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm RTT mapping and invalidation helpers Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] KVM: Allow architectures to reject memslot changes before invalidation Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Prevent memslot modifications after Realm creation Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Support runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-11-11 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] KVM: arm64: CCA: Add Realm stage-2 MMU operations Steven Price
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbc33983-cb8a-48e4-854f-ce009cc5668f@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®