From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
amitk@kernel.org, Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com,
ionela.voinescu@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:30:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc3228c2-d668-6f32-8965-00896b630351@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ef6bcc10-7034-0ac1-b832-938393682d2f@arm.com>
On 26/11/2020 15:02, Lukasz Luba wrote:
[ ... ]
>>> changed via sysfs.
>>>
>>> Could you take it please? It should apply smoothly in your tree.
>>
>> Actually, I'm waiting for Ionela and Dietmar ack.
>>
>>
>
> Are they maintainers of this file that you need their ACKs?
> Maybe I should drop mine then.
Ok let me clarify :)
In general when someone comments on the changes, I usually wait for the
consensus before merging the patches. If the persons who commented
before are unresponsive, depending on the context and my perception, I
apply the changes or not.
I'm giving the opportunity to Ionela to review the series again as she
commented the previous version (and gave a reviewed-by). I thought also
Dietmar commented the series but apparently I was wrong.
As you stated, you are the maintainer of the subsystem, so if there are
no acked-by or reviewed-by, the series will be applied anyway soon.
Meanwhile, they are in the 'testing' branch of the tree, the antechamber
of 'linux-next' and 'next' ;)
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-26 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-24 16:10 Lukasz Luba
2020-11-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] thermal: power allocator: change the 'k_i' coefficient estimation Lukasz Luba
2020-11-26 16:00 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] thermal: power allocator: refactor sustainable power estimation Lukasz Luba
2020-11-26 15:59 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-26 16:26 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-11-24 16:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] thermal: power allocator: change the 'k_*' always in estimate_pid_constants() Lukasz Luba
2020-11-26 16:00 ` Ionela Voinescu
2020-11-26 12:49 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Improve the estimations in Intelligent Power Allocation Lukasz Luba
2020-11-26 13:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2020-11-26 14:02 ` Lukasz Luba
2020-11-26 14:30 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2020-11-26 14:45 ` Lukasz Luba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fc3228c2-d668-6f32-8965-00896b630351@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=Dietmar.Eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=amitk@kernel.org \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukasz.luba@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®