From: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, storagedev@microchip.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 05/10] scsi: Use block layer helpers to constrain queue affinity
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 14:30:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdbc2ddc-830b-4727-88ae-5347fea8fca8@flourine.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c06d0ef2-6bd2-4f5d-895f-0255415b2a24@suse.de>
On Fri, Jul 04, 2025 at 12:28:49PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> It really shouldn't be an issue when the cpus are distributed 'correctly'
> :-)
If I get the drift, we start to discuss how the mapping could be
normally, so not for isolcpus. The isolcpus case is just how many hwq
are available (and affinity):
num queues to map = min(num housekeeping CPUs, #hwq)
and then it's common code, no special housekeeping mapping code.
> We have several possibilities:
> -> #hwq > num_possible_cpus: easy, 1:1 mapping, no problem
I agree, no problem here.
> -> num_online_cpu < #hwq < num_possible_cpus: Not as easy, but if we
> ensure that each online cpu is mapped to a different hwq we don't
> have a performance impact.
This should also be fairly straightforward too. First assign each online
CPU a hwq and distribute the rest of the hwq amount the rest of the
possible offline CPUs.
> -> #hwq < num_online_cpu: If we ensure that a) the number of online cpus
> per hwq is (roughly) identical we won't have a performance impact.
> As a bonus we should strive to have the number of offline cpus
> distributed equally on each hwq.
__group_cpus_evenly is handling this pretty well.
> Of course, that doesn't take into accound NUMA locality; with NUMA locality
> you would need to ensure to have at least one CPU per NUMA node
> mapped to each hwq. Which actually would impose a lower limit on the
> number (and granularity!) of hwqs (namely the number of NUMA nodes), but
> that's fair, I guess.
Again __group_cpus_evenly is taking NUMA into account as I understand it.
> But this really can be delegated to later patches; initially we really
> should identify which drivers might have issues with CPU hotplug,
> and at the very least issue a warning for these drivers.
There are different ways I suppose. My approach is not to change the
drivers too much because I don't have access to all the hardware for
testing. Instead extend the core code so that the different cases are
covered.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-04 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 16:33 [PATCH v7 00/10] blk: honor isolcpus configuration Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 01/10] lib/group_cpus: Add group_masks_cpus_evenly() Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-09-03 12:36 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-11 8:28 ` John Garry
2025-09-03 12:42 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 02/10] genirq/affinity: Add cpumask to struct irq_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:19 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 03/10] blk-mq: add blk_mq_{online|possible}_queue_affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 04/10] nvme-pci: use block layer helpers to constrain queue affinity Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:29 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 05/10] scsi: Use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:37 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-04 10:28 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 12:30 ` Daniel Wagner [this message]
2025-09-05 7:41 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 06/10] virtio: blk/scsi: use " Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:43 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 07/10] isolation: Introduce io_queue isolcpus type Daniel Wagner
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 08/10] blk-mq: use hk cpus only when isolcpus=io_queue is enabled Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-04 9:21 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 9:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-04 9:00 ` Daniel Wagner
2025-07-07 5:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-03 14:47 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-02 16:33 ` [PATCH v7 09/10] blk-mq: prevent offlining hk CPUs with associated online isolated CPUs Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:58 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-07 7:44 ` Ming Lei
2025-07-08 1:31 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-08 1:23 ` Aaron Tomlin
2025-07-02 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 10/10] docs: add io_queue flag to isolcpus Daniel Wagner
2025-07-03 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-07-08 1:26 ` Aaron Tomlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdbc2ddc-830b-4727-88ae-5347fea8fca8@flourine.local \
--to=dwagner@suse.de \
--cc=GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@marvell.com \
--cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=costa.shul@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llong@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=storagedev@microchip.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wagi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®