mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:35:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff0d4285-471b-7a33-15a5-3ce89443b41a@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <302fa562-612b-0853-31de-a11399e5aa08@nvidia.com>

Yang,

> Question 1 :- What prevents us from using the same format for
> both blk_rq_complete() and blk_rq_error() ?
> 
> Question 2 :- assuming that blk_rq_complete() and blk_rq_error()
> are using same format why can't we :-
> 
> declare DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(blk_rq_completion....)
> and use that class for blk_rq_complete() and blk_rq_error() ?
> 
> since if I remember correctly we need to define a event class
> instead of duplicating a tracepoint with similar reporting.

What I meant is following compile tested patch (although it will
need to split into a prep patch in order to post it) :-

diff --git a/include/trace/events/block.h b/include/trace/events/block.h
index 27170e40e8c9..7f4dfbdf12a6 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/block.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/block.h
@@ -100,19 +100,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_requeue,
                   __entry->nr_sector, 0)
  );

-/**
- * block_rq_complete - block IO operation completed by device driver
- * @rq: block operations request
- * @error: status code
- * @nr_bytes: number of completed bytes
- *
- * The block_rq_complete tracepoint event indicates that some portion
- * of operation request has been completed by the device driver.  If
- * the @rq->bio is %NULL, then there is absolutely no additional work to
- * do for the request. If @rq->bio is non-NULL then there is
- * additional work required to complete the request.
- */
-TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_complete,
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq_completion,

         TP_PROTO(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error, unsigned int 
nr_bytes),

@@ -144,6 +132,41 @@ TRACE_EVENT(block_rq_complete,
                   __entry->nr_sector, __entry->error)
  );

+/**
+ * block_rq_complete - block IO operation completed by device driver
+ * @rq: block operations request
+ * @error: status code
+ * @nr_bytes: number of completed bytes
+ *
+ * The block_rq_complete tracepoint event indicates that some portion
+ * of operation request has been completed by the device driver.  If
+ * the @rq->bio is %NULL, then there is absolutely no additional work to
+ * do for the request. If @rq->bio is non-NULL then there is
+ * additional work required to complete the request.
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq_completion, block_rq_complete,
+
+       TP_PROTO(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error, unsigned int 
nr_bytes),
+
+       TP_ARGS(rq, error, nr_bytes)
+);
+
+/**
+ * block_rq_error - block IO operation error reported by device driver
+ * @rq: block operations request
+ * @error: status code
+ * @nr_bytes: number of completed bytes
+ *
+ * The block_rq_error tracepoint event indicates that some portion
+ * of operation request has failed as reported by the device driver.
+ */
+DEFINE_EVENT(block_rq_completion, block_rq_error,
+
+       TP_PROTO(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error, unsigned int 
nr_bytes),
+
+       TP_ARGS(rq, error, nr_bytes)
+);
+
  DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(block_rq,

         TP_PROTO(struct request *rq),
> 
> -ck
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-04  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-03 20:12 Yang Shi
2022-02-04  2:46 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-02-04  8:35   ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-02-04 18:10     ` Yang Shi
2022-02-04 18:08   ` Yang Shi
2022-02-05  9:12     ` Chaitanya Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff0d4285-471b-7a33-15a5-3ce89443b41a@nvidia.com \
    --to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®