mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	ionela.voinescu@arm.com, quentin.perret@arm.com,
	srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
	mingo@kernel.org, yu.c.chen@intel.com,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/topology: remove sysctl_sched_energy_aware depending on the architecture
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 15:35:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff3a1e32-74c3-56bc-94dc-78d088faf8b7@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xhsmhfs3fve7k.mognet@vschneid.remote.csb>

Hello Valentin,

On 9/15/23 14:00, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 14/09/23 23:26, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>> On 9/14/23 9:51 PM, Valentin Schneider wrote:
>>> On 13/09/23 17:18, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
>>>> sysctl_sched_energy_aware is available for the admin to disable/enable
>>>> energy aware scheduling(EAS). EAS is enabled only if few conditions are
>>>> met by the platform. They are, asymmetric CPU capacity, no SMT,
>>>> valid cpufreq policy, frequency invariant load tracking. It is possible
>>>> platform when booting may not have EAS capability, but can do that after.
>>>> For example, changing/registering the cpufreq policy.
>>>>
>>>> At present, though platform doesn't support EAS, this sysctl is still
>>>> present and it ends up calling rebuild of sched domain on write to 1 and
>>>> NOP when writing to 0. That is confusing and un-necessary.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Valentin, Thanks for taking a look at this patch.
>>
>>> But why would you write to it in the first place? Or do you mean to use
>>> this as an indicator for userspace that EAS is supported?
>>>
>>
>> Since this sysctl is present and its value being 1, it gives the
>> impression to the user that EAS is supported when it is not.
>> So its an attempt to correct that part.
>>
> 
> Ah, I see. Then how about just making the sysctl return 0 when EAS isn't
> supported? And on top of it, prevent all writes when EAS isn't supported
> (perf domains cannot be built, so there would be no point in forcing a
> rebuild that will do nothing).

I think the issue comes from the fact there is no variable representing
whether EAS is supported or not. sched_energy_enabled()/sched_energy_present
tells whether EAS is actively running on the system instead.

So on a system with EAS running, I think what would happen is:
# Disable EAS and set sched_energy_present=0
echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_energy_aware

# sched_energy_present==0, so we get -EOPNOTSUPP
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_energy_aware


> 
> I can never remember how to properly use the sysctl API, so that's a very
> crude implementation, but something like so?
> 
> ---
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index 05a5bc678c089..dadfc5afc4121 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -230,9 +230,28 @@ static int sched_energy_aware_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>   	if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>   		return -EPERM;
>   
> +	if (!sched_energy_enabled()) {
> +		if (write)
> +			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		else {
> +			size_t len;
> +
> +			if (*ppos) {
> +				*lenp = 0;
> +				return 0;
> +			}
> +
> +			len = snprintf((char *)buffer, 3, "0\n");
> +
> +			*lenp = len;
> +			*ppos += len;
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>   	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
>   	if (!ret && write) {
> -		state = static_branch_unlikely(&sched_energy_present);
> +		state = sched_energy_enabled();
>   		if (state != sysctl_sched_energy_aware)
>   			rebuild_sched_domains_energy();
>   	}
> 

Regards,
Pierre

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-15 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-13 11:48 Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-14  0:01 ` kernel test robot
2023-09-14 17:59   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-14 16:21 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-09-14 17:56   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-15 12:00     ` Valentin Schneider
2023-09-15 13:35       ` Pierre Gondois [this message]
2023-09-18 12:21         ` Valentin Schneider
2023-09-15 18:10       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-18 12:22         ` Valentin Schneider
2023-09-18 17:39           ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-22 14:44           ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-22 21:02             ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-20 17:47       ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-09-18 12:00 ` Pierre Gondois
2023-09-18 12:57   ` Phil Auld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff3a1e32-74c3-56bc-94dc-78d088faf8b7@arm.com \
    --to=pierre.gondois@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®