mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Yang Yang <yang.yang@vivo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sbitmap: fix io hung due to race on sbitmap_word::cleared
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:41:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff5cc2b2-bf8e-4a48-8422-cdaac4129043@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240710065616.1060803-1-yang.yang@vivo.com>

On 7/9/24 11:56 PM, Yang Yang wrote:
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&map->swap_lock, flags);

Please use guard(spinlock_irqsave) in new code instead of 
spin_lock_irqsave() + goto out_unlock + spin_unlock_irqrestore().
That will make this function significantly easier to read and to
maintain.

> +
> +	if (!map->cleared) {
> +		if (depth > 0) {
> +			word_mask = (~0UL) >> (BITS_PER_LONG - depth);
> +			/*
> +			 * The current behavior is to always retry after moving
> +			 * ->cleared to word, and we change it to retry in case
> +			 * of any free bits. To avoid dead loop, we need to take

What is a "dead loop"? Did you perhaps want to write "infinite loop"?

> +			 * wrap & alloc_hint into account. Without this, a soft
> +			 * lockup was detected in our test environment.

Source code comments should not refer to "our test environment". Code
that is intended for upstream inclusion should work for all setups.

> +			 */
> +			if (!wrap && alloc_hint)
> +				word_mask &= ~((1UL << alloc_hint) - 1);

Above I see an open-coded __clear_bit() operation. Has it been
considered to use __clear_bit() instead of open-coding it?

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-10 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-10  6:56 Yang Yang
2024-07-10 16:41 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-07-11  9:47   ` YangYang
2024-07-10 19:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-07-11 12:48   ` YangYang
2024-07-11 13:39     ` Ming Lei
2024-07-11 16:33       ` Bart Van Assche
2024-07-12  1:01         ` Ming Lei
2024-07-12 17:53           ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff5cc2b2-bf8e-4a48-8422-cdaac4129043@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=yang.yang@vivo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®