From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] vsock/test: Expand linger test to ensure close() does not misbehave
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 00:47:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff959c3e-4c47-4f93-8ab8-32446bb0e0d0@rbox.co> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGxU2F59O7QK2Q7TeaP6GU9wHrDMTpcO94TKz72UQndXfgNLVA@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/6/25 11:46, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, 6 May 2025 at 11:43, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 10:05:24AM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>> There was an issue with SO_LINGER: instead of blocking until all queued
>>> messages for the socket have been successfully sent (or the linger timeout
>>> has been reached), close() would block until packets were handled by the
>>> peer.
>>
>> This is a new behaviour that only new kernels will follow, so I think
>> it is better to add a new test instead of extending a pre-existing test
>> that we described as "SOCK_STREAM SO_LINGER null-ptr-deref".
>>
>> The old test should continue to check the null-ptr-deref also for old
>> kernels, while the new test will check the new behaviour, so we can skip
>> the new test while testing an old kernel.
Right, I'll split it.
> I also saw that we don't have any test to verify that actually the
> lingering is working, should we add it since we are touching it?
Yeah, I agree we should. Do you have any suggestion how this could be done
reliably?
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-01 8:05 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] vsock: SOCK_LINGER rework Michal Luczaj
2025-05-01 8:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] vsock/virtio: Linger on unsent data Michal Luczaj
2025-05-06 9:44 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-01 8:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] vsock: Move lingering logic to af_vsock core Michal Luczaj
2025-05-06 9:53 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-06 22:47 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-05-01 8:05 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] vsock/test: Expand linger test to ensure close() does not misbehave Michal Luczaj
2025-05-06 9:43 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-06 9:46 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-06 22:47 ` Michal Luczaj [this message]
2025-05-07 8:26 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-12 12:23 ` Michal Luczaj
2025-05-20 8:54 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-20 9:01 ` Stefano Garzarella
2025-05-20 10:20 ` Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ff959c3e-4c47-4f93-8ab8-32446bb0e0d0@rbox.co \
--to=mhal@rbox.co \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®