From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
rkrcmar@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com,
Yang Zhang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>,
wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 12:36:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgsibbf0bt.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430393772-27208-8-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:36:06 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> This patch includes changes to the external API for SMM support.
> All the changes are predicated by the availability of a new
> capability, KVM_CAP_X86_SMM, which is added at the end of the
> patch series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 7 +++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/kvm_cache_regs.h | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 5 ++++-
> 6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
...
>
>
> +#define KVM_RUN_X86_SMM (1 << 0)
> +
> /* for KVM_GET_REGS and KVM_SET_REGS */
> struct kvm_regs {
> /* out (KVM_GET_REGS) / in (KVM_SET_REGS) */
> @@ -281,6 +283,7 @@ struct kvm_reinject_control {
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING 0x00000001
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR 0x00000002
> #define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW 0x00000004
> +#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM 0x00000008
Note the formatting above is different in Linus' tree.
I can't seem to find where it changed.
/* When set in flags, include corresponding fields on KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS */
#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING 0x00000001
#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR 0x00000002
#define KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SHADOW 0x00000004
...
> +static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_smi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int vcpu_ioctl_tpr_access_reporting(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_tpr_access_ctl *tac)
> {
> @@ -3116,29 +3121,31 @@ static void kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_vcpu_events *events)
> {
> process_nmi(vcpu);
> +
> + memset(events, 0, sizeof(*events));
I think that it's better that the caller memsets this before passing it over
to the *_get_vcpu_events function.
...
>
> /* in (pre_kvm_run), out (post_kvm_run) */
> __u64 cr8;
> @@ -814,6 +814,7 @@ struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info {
> #define KVM_CAP_S390_INJECT_IRQ 113
> #define KVM_CAP_S390_IRQ_STATE 114
> #define KVM_CAP_PPC_HWRNG 115
> +#define KVM_CAP_X86_SMM 120
Why didn't we reserve the next available number here ?
> #ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQ_ROUTING
>
> @@ -1199,6 +1200,8 @@ struct kvm_s390_ucas_mapping {
> /* Available with KVM_CAP_S390_IRQ_STATE */
> #define KVM_S390_SET_IRQ_STATE _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb5, struct kvm_s390_irq_state)
> #define KVM_S390_GET_IRQ_STATE _IOW(KVMIO, 0xb6, struct kvm_s390_irq_state)
> +/* Available with KVM_CAP_X86_SMM */
> +#define KVM_SMI _IO(KVMIO, 0xb7)
>
> #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU (1 << 0)
> #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3 (1 << 1)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 11:35 [RFC PATCH 00/13] KVM: x86: " Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: MMU: fix for CR4.SMEP=1, CR0.WP=0? Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-08 2:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: reuse memslot in kvm_write_guest_page Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 15:03 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 16:29 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: export __gfn_to_pfn_memslot, drop gfn_to_pfn_async Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: remove unnecessary arg from mark_page_dirty_in_slot, export it Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: x86: pass host_initiated to functions that read MSRs Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 14:01 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-04 16:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: x86: pass the whole hflags field to emulator and back Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 15:47 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 16:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 16:49 ` Bandan Das
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86: API changes for SMM support Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 15:37 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-04 16:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 16:36 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2015-05-05 16:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: x86: stubs " Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 17:51 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 18:38 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-05 18:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: x86: save/load state on SMM switch Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-04 19:59 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 12:48 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-05 13:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 20:44 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 10:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 17:55 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 19:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-12 23:56 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-13 6:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86: add vcpu-specific functions to read/write/translate GFNs Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 11/13] KVM: x86: add SMM to the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86: add KVM_MEM_X86_SMRAM memory slot flag Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 17:17 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 16:24 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 18:15 ` Bandan Das
2015-05-06 19:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-15 20:32 ` Avi Kivity
2015-05-18 8:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-30 11:36 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: x86: advertise KVM_CAP_X86_SMM Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-05 18:40 ` [RFC PATCH 00/13] KVM: x86: SMM support Radim Krčmář
2015-05-06 11:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-06 17:14 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-05-19 14:25 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2015-05-19 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-20 1:03 ` Zhang, Yang Z
2015-05-20 15:22 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgsibbf0bt.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome