From: Simon Easter <simon.easter@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix SD card detection and use correct transfer interval.
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 12:06:10 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20131005T140209-999@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370103731-5667-2-git-send-email-marcus.overhagen@gmail.com>
Marcus Overhagen <marcus.overhagen <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Increasing the timeout when polling for card status to 100ms
> as used at other places in this driver fixes SD card detection.
>
> Also use correct interval when doing the interrupt transfer,
> this fixes the "xhci_queue_intr_tx: 74 callbacks suppressed"
> spamming to syslog that was occuring when this driver is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Overhagen <marcus.overhagen <at> gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rts5139/rts51x_transport.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rts5139/rts51x_transport.c
b/drivers/staging/rts5139/rts51x_transport.c
> index 89e4d80..c172f4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rts5139/rts51x_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rts5139/rts51x_transport.c
> <at> <at> -635,12 +635,12 <at> <at> int rts51x_get_epc_status(struct
rts51x_chip *chip, u16 *status)
> ep = chip->usb->pusb_dev->ep_in[usb_pipeendpoint(pipe)];
>
> /* fill and submit the URB */
> - /* We set interval to 1 here, so the polling interval is controlled
> - * by our polling thread */
> + /* Set interval to 10 here to match the endpoint descriptor,
> + * the polling interval is controlled by the polling thread */
> usb_fill_int_urb(chip->usb->intr_urb, chip->usb->pusb_dev, pipe,
> - status, 2, urb_done_completion, &urb_done, 1);
> + status, 2, urb_done_completion, &urb_done, 10);
>
> - result = rts51x_msg_common(chip, chip->usb->intr_urb, 50);
> + result = rts51x_msg_common(chip, chip->usb->intr_urb, 100);
>
> return interpret_urb_result(chip, pipe, 2, result,
> chip->usb->intr_urb->actual_length);
Hi Marcus,
I'm trying to apply this patch to 3.8.0-18 kernel tree but looks like it
doesn't want to take (Ubuntu 13.04 stock)
I don't suppose you have a patch for this version?, not quite sure if
reading
the patch file properly but assuming I get changes in what is the correct
way to just compile this module and insert into running config?
Thanks
Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-05 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-01 16:22 [PATCH 0/1] rts5139 " Marcus Overhagen
2013-06-01 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Marcus Overhagen
2013-10-05 12:06 ` Simon Easter [this message]
2013-11-05 20:01 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20131005T140209-999@post.gmane.org \
--to=simon.easter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®