From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
"Protasevich, Natalie" <Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle IRQ -1"
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 10:52:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14pugxe47.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061007080315.GM14186@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> (Muli Ben-Yehuda's message of "Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:03:15 +0200")
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:42:40PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> If I read your bootlog right. You have logical cpus, but only two
>> sockets, and I think only two cores. The other two logical cpus
>> being hyperthreaded.
>
> Yes, 2 sockets each of which is HT. Here's a /proc/cpuinfo from a
> distro kernel:
Ok. From looking at an individual case the ioapic is programmed
correctly and I don't see a reason the local apic would be programmed
incorrectly. However logical delivery mode and lowest priority
delivery mode are enabled. So we are asking the interrupt delivery
subsystem to choose a cpu to deliver the interrupt to and then are not
giving the cpu any choice. So we may be confusing things.
Can you try CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG? That will force genapic to be set
to genapic_physflat instead of genapic_flat.
I am hoping that by running the apics in a different delivery mode
that explicitly says just deliver this interrupt to this cpu we
will avoid the problem you are seeing.
If genapic_physflat works we will have to decide what to do about
genapic_flat.
Thanks,
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-07 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-05 21:22 Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 15:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 15:50 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 16:20 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 19:00 ` Andrew Vasquez
2006-10-06 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-06 20:02 ` Andrew Vasquez
2006-10-06 20:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-06 20:42 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 20:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 19:53 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-10-06 17:47 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 20:23 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 23:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-07 8:03 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-07 16:52 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-10-07 17:59 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-08 13:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 irq fixes Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/x86_64: FIX pci_enable_irq to set dev->irq to the irq number Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] i386/x86_64: Remove global IO_APIC_VECTOR Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86_64 irq: Allocate a vector across all cpus for genapic_flat Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 19:01 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-08 18:59 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 irq fixes Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-07 19:03 ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle IRQ -1" Linus Torvalds
2006-10-07 19:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-07 19:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-09 6:06 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09 7:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 14:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09 15:28 ` Protasevich, Natalie
2006-10-09 15:39 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 16:02 ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannothandle " Protasevich, Natalie
2006-10-07 20:24 ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle " Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 17:22 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 18:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 18:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09 5:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] x86_64 irq: Scream but don't die if we receive an unexpected irq Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m14pugxe47.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
--cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
--cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome