mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>,
	"Protasevich, Natalie" <Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle IRQ -1"
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 10:52:24 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m14pugxe47.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061007080315.GM14186@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> (Muli Ben-Yehuda's message of "Sat, 7 Oct 2006 10:03:15 +0200")

Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@il.ibm.com> writes:

> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 05:42:40PM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> If I read your bootlog right. You have logical cpus, but only two
>> sockets, and I think only two cores.  The other two logical cpus
>> being hyperthreaded.
>
> Yes, 2 sockets each of which is HT. Here's a /proc/cpuinfo from a
> distro kernel:

Ok.  From looking at an individual case the ioapic is programmed
correctly and I don't see a reason the local apic would be programmed
incorrectly.  However logical delivery mode and lowest priority
delivery mode are enabled.  So we are asking the interrupt delivery
subsystem to choose a cpu to deliver the interrupt to and then are not
giving the cpu any choice.  So we may be confusing things. 

Can you try CONFIG_CPU_HOTPLUG?  That will force genapic to be set
to genapic_physflat instead of genapic_flat.

I am hoping that by running the apics in a different delivery mode
that explicitly says just deliver this interrupt to this cpu we
will avoid the problem you are seeing.

If genapic_physflat works we will have to decide what to do about
genapic_flat.

Thanks,

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-07 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-05 21:22 Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 15:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 15:50   ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 16:20     ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 19:00       ` Andrew Vasquez
2006-10-06 19:42         ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-06 20:02           ` Andrew Vasquez
2006-10-06 20:15             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 20:18             ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-06 20:42             ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 20:14           ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 19:53       ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-10-06 17:47     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 20:23       ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-06 23:42         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-07  8:03           ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-07 16:52             ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-10-07 17:59               ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-08 13:39                 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 irq fixes Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:41                   ` [PATCH 1/3] i386/x86_64: FIX pci_enable_irq to set dev->irq to the irq number Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:43                     ` [PATCH 2/3] i386/x86_64: Remove global IO_APIC_VECTOR Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 13:47                       ` [PATCH 3/3] x86_64 irq: Allocate a vector across all cpus for genapic_flat Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-08 19:01                         ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-08 18:59                   ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64 irq fixes Muli Ben-Yehuda
2006-10-07 19:03               ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle IRQ -1" Linus Torvalds
2006-10-07 19:33                 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-07 19:57                   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-09  6:06                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09  7:40                       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 14:46                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09 15:28                           ` Protasevich, Natalie
2006-10-09 15:39                             ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 16:02                               ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannothandle " Protasevich, Natalie
2006-10-07 20:24                 ` 2.6.19-rc1 genirq causes either boot hang or "do_IRQ: cannot handle " Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 16:02   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 17:22     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-06 18:08       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-10-06 18:48         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-10-09  5:41         ` [PATCH 1/1] x86_64 irq: Scream but don't die if we receive an unexpected irq Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m14pugxe47.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=muli@il.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
    --cc=rajesh.shah@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome