mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven.
Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2006 07:27:22 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1fyf2lc91.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0609081507330.20566@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (Jan Engelhardt's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2006 15:08:48 +0200 (MEST)")

Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> writes:

>>>>> +	for (; nr < (ARRAY_SIZE(proc_base_stuff) - 1); filp->f_pos++, nr++) {
>>>>
>>> Also works without the () around ARRAY_SIZE(..)-1
>>
>>Sure.  But I don't really trust C precedence (because it is wrong)
>
> Wrong? In mathematics, "a < (b - 1)" also is equivalent to "a < b - 1".

In mathematics < is not an operation that yields a result in
the domain of integers.  So  "(a < b) - 1" is impossible.

Regardless this isn't a case where the C precedence is wrong.
"a < b | 1" is an example of C getting the precedence wrong.

Having to remember where C is wrong and in what circumstances is
harder than just putting in parenthesis.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-08 13:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-06 16:23 Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] proc: Factor out an instantiate method from every lookup method Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 16:27   ` [PATCH 3/5] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 16:28     ` [PATCH 4/5] proc: Merge proc_tid_attr and proc_tgid_attr Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-06 16:31       ` [PATCH 5/5] proc: Use pid_task instead of open coding it Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 17:22     ` [PATCH 3/5] proc: Remove the hard coded inode numbers Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 17:55       ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 18:06         ` Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 18:37           ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 17:18   ` [PATCH 2/5] proc: Factor out an instantiate method from every lookup method Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 18:08     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-07 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/5] proc: Make the generation of the self symlink table driven Andrew Morton
2006-09-07 18:04   ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-08  7:07   ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 11:04     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-09-08 13:08       ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-08 13:27         ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-09-08 16:55           ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-09-09  2:34             ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1fyf2lc91.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome