From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc5-mm] pids: kill PIDTYPE_TGID
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 13:00:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1irqovh8l.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440F2F4A.3E91C272@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:23:54 +0300")
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> Changes:
> s/tgrp/thread_group/
>
> make it rcu-safe
>
> [PATCH rc5-mm] pids: kill PIDTYPE_TGID
>
> depends on pidhash-dont-count-idle-threads.patch
>
> This patch kills PIDTYPE_TGID pid_type thus saving one hash table
> in kernel/pid.c and speeding up subthreads create/destroy a bit.
> It is also a preparation for the further tref/pids rework.
>
> This patch adds 'struct list_head thread_group' to 'struct task_struct'
> instead.
>
> We don't detach group leader from PIDTYPE_PID namespace until another
> thread inherits it's ->pid == ->tgid, so we are safe wrt premature
> free_pidmap(->tgid) call.
>
> Currently there are no users of find_task_by_pid_type(PIDTYPE_TGID).
> Should the need arise, we can use find_task_by_pid()->group_leader.
Looks good. I have one final nit.
> --- 2.6.16-rc5/kernel/fork.c~1_TGID 2006-03-09 00:17:24.000000000 +0300
> +++ 2.6.16-rc5/kernel/fork.c 2006-03-09 00:41:35.000000000 +0300
> @@ -1100,6 +1100,7 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
> * We dont wake it up yet.
> */
> p->group_leader = p;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->thread_group);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->ptrace_children);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->ptrace_list);
>
> @@ -1153,7 +1154,9 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
> retval = -EAGAIN;
> goto bad_fork_cleanup_namespace;
> }
> +
> p->group_leader = current->group_leader;
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&p->thread_group, ¤t->thread_group);
Can this be:
list_add_tail_rcu(&p->thread_group, ¤t->group_leader->thread_group);
That way at least the odds of missing a new task_struct when doing an
rcu traversal are reduced almost to 0.
>
> if (current->signal->group_stop_count > 0) {
> /*
> @@ -1201,7 +1204,6 @@ static task_t *copy_process(unsigned lon
> list_add_tail(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
> __get_cpu_var(process_counts)++;
> }
> - attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_TGID, p->tgid);
> attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PID, p->pid);
> nr_threads++;
> }
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-08 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-07 20:19 Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-07 22:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-08 14:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 16:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-08 19:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 20:00 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-03-08 21:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 22:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1irqovh8l.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®