mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rc5-mm] pids: kill PIDTYPE_TGID
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:12:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1zmk0twk4.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440F50A7.EBAD87D5@tv-sign.ru> (Oleg Nesterov's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:46:15 +0300")

Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>>
>> >               p->group_leader = current->group_leader;
>> > +             list_add_tail_rcu(&p->thread_group, &current->thread_group);
>> Can this be:
>> list_add_tail_rcu(&p->thread_group, &current->group_leader->thread_group);
>
> Done.
>
>> That way at least the odds of missing a new task_struct when doing an
>> rcu traversal are reduced almost to 0.
>
> Am I understand correctly? This change has effect when we are doing the
> traversal starting from ->group_leader in a "best effort" manner lockless,
> yes?

Yes.  The important point for reasoning about it is that we have a fixed
point that we append or prepend to.

I think I have finally figured out the invariants we will need to
send signals using just the rcu_read_lock().  In that case we want to
traverse the list in such a way that we are guaranteed to never see
new entries.  That gives us an atomic snapshot of the tasks to send
signals to, and it gives us a progress guarantee.

Now I need to look and see if any one has documented any rules
regarding atomicity of sending signals to a group of processes.


> [PATCH rc5-mm] pids: kill PIDTYPE_TGID
>
> depends on pidhash-dont-count-idle-threads.patch
>
> This patch kills PIDTYPE_TGID pid_type thus saving one hash table
> in kernel/pid.c and speeding up subthreads create/destroy a bit.
> It is also a preparation for the further tref/pids rework.
>
> This patch adds 'struct list_head thread_group' to 'struct task_struct'
> instead.
>
> We don't detach group leader from PIDTYPE_PID namespace until another
> thread inherits it's ->pid == ->tgid, so we are safe wrt premature
> free_pidmap(->tgid) call.
>
> Currently there are no users of find_task_by_pid_type(PIDTYPE_TGID).
> Should the need arise, we can use find_task_by_pid()->group_leader.
>
>  include/linux/pid.h   |    1 -
>  include/linux/sched.h |   11 ++++++++---
>  kernel/exit.c         |   10 +---------
>  kernel/fork.c         |    4 +++-
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

Acked-By: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2006-03-08 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-07 20:19 Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-07 22:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-08 14:41   ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 16:19     ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-08 19:23       ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 20:00         ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-03-08 21:46           ` Oleg Nesterov
2006-03-08 22:12             ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1zmk0twk4.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®