From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.4-rc1 fix x86 early_printk and make it early
Date: 01 Mar 2004 08:47:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1r7wc8t78.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040301115813.6194f2fe.ak@suse.de>
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de> writes:
> On 29 Feb 2004 22:24:12 -0700
> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>
> > o That is problematic with PAE support, because there is a moment
> > during paging_init() when the physical identity mappings do not
> > work.
>
> Just don't printk in that moment then.
>
> > o Using raw physical addresses is in bad form, and doesn't always work.
>
> On x86-64 it's that __pa() doesn't always work very early.
>
> > o I can't possibly see how Andrew's Changelog that using __pa
> > is more friendly to the 4G/4G split is correct. Unless someone
> > was hard coding a virtual address previously.
>
> Yes, it shouldn't make any difference for 4/4.
>
> > The second hunk in early_printk.c redefines VGABASE as __va(0xb8000).
> > This is correct on both x86 and x86-64 so we don't need any more
> > special cases.
>
> Please don't do that on x86-64. On x86-64 there are two ways to reach this
> address and the previous one is available earlier. Keep the current
> address for x86-64 please.
??? I checked the x86-64 early page tables and it does appear to work.
That is why I consolidated the change.
In particular from arch/x86_64/head.S:
.org 0x1000
ENTRY(init_level4_pgt)
.quad 0x0000000000102007 /* -> level3_ident_pgt */
.fill 255,8,0
.quad 0x000000000010a007
.fill 254,8,0
/* (2^48-(2*1024*1024*1024))/(2^39) = 511 */
.quad 0x0000000000103007 /* -> level3_kernel_pgt */
.org 0x3000
ENTRY(level3_kernel_pgt)
.fill 510,8,0
/* (2^48-(2*1024*1024*1024)-((2^39)*511))/(2^30) = 510 */
.quad 0x0000000000105007 /* -> level2_kernel_pgt */
.fill 1,8,0
.org 0xa000
ENTRY(level3_physmem_pgt)
.quad 0x0000000000105007 /* -> level2_kernel_pgt (so that __va works even before pagetable_init) */
0x0000010000000000 is handled by the pointer: 0x000000000010a007
0xffffffff80000000 is handled by the pointer: 0x0000000000103007
And then they both point to: 0x0000000000103007 which is the physical mapping.
And of course there is the comment on the 0xa000 entry:
(so that __va works even before pagetable_init)
So I don't see how using __va() early in the code is incorrect. I can
buy that __va() adds the wrong constant but that is another matter.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-01 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-01 5:24 Eric W. Biederman
2004-03-01 10:58 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-01 15:47 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-03-02 8:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1r7wc8t78.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®