From: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch 02/18] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:24:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38vuu3dms.fsf@IBM-009124035060.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303332697-16426-3-git-send-email-ncrao@google.com>
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:51:21 -0700, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com> wrote:
> Introduce SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION, which scales is added to SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT and
> increases the resolution of SCHED_LOAD_SCALE. This patch sets the value of
> SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION to 10, scaling up the weights for all sched entities by
> a factor of 1024. With this extra resolution, we can handle deeper cgroup
> hiearchies and the scheduler can do better shares distribution and load
> load balancing on larger systems (especially for low weight task groups).
>
> This does not change the existing user interface, the scaled weights are only
> used internally. We do not modify prio_to_weight values or inverses, but use
> the original weights when calculating the inverse which is used to scale
> execution time delta in calc_delta_mine(). This ensures we do not lose accuracy
> when accounting time to the sched entities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 3 ++-
> kernel/sched.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 8d1ff2b..d2c3bab 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -794,7 +794,8 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
> /*
> * Increase resolution of nice-level calculations:
> */
> -#define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT 10
> +#define SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION 10
> +#define SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT (10 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION)
> #define SCHED_LOAD_SCALE (1L << SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT)
>
> /*
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 50f97cc..bfee8ff 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
> * limitation from this.)
> */
> #define MIN_SHARES 2
> -#define MAX_SHARES (1UL << 18)
> +#define MAX_SHARES (1UL << 28)
Shouldn't this change depend on SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION?
#define MAX_SHARES (1UL << (18 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION))
Nikunj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-20 20:51 [RFC][PATCH 00/18] Increase resolution of load weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 01/18] sched: introduce SCHED_POWER_SCALE to scale cpu_power calculations Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 02/18] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution Nikhil Rao
2011-04-28 9:54 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania [this message]
2011-04-28 17:11 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 03/18] sched: use u64 for load_weight fields Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 04/18] sched: update cpu_load to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 05/18] sched: update this_cpu_load() to return u64 value Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 06/18] sched: update source_load(), target_load() and weighted_cpuload() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 07/18] sched: update find_idlest_cpu() to use u64 for load Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 08/18] sched: update find_idlest_group() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 09/18] sched: update division in cpu_avg_load_per_task to use div_u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 10/18] sched: update wake_affine path to use u64, s64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 11/18] sched: update update_sg_lb_stats() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 12/18] sched: Update update_sd_lb_stats() " Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 13/18] sched: update f_b_g() to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 14/18] sched: change type of imbalance to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 15/18] sched: update h_load to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 16/18] sched: update move_task() and helper functions to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 17/18] sched: update f_b_q() to use u64 for weighted cpuload Nikhil Rao
2011-04-20 20:51 ` [RFC][Patch 18/18] sched: update shares distribution to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-04-21 6:16 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/18] Increase resolution of load weights Ingo Molnar
2011-04-21 16:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-26 16:11 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-21 16:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-04-28 7:07 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2011-04-28 11:48 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2011-04-28 12:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2011-04-28 18:33 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-28 18:51 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 18:53 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 21:27 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-04-29 16:55 ` Paul Turner
2011-04-28 18:20 ` Nikhil Rao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38vuu3dms.fsf@IBM-009124035060.in.ibm.com \
--to=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®