Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] mm: Unify device DAX and HugeTLB vmemmap population paths

[Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>]

Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> writes:

>> On Sep 29, 2026, at 01:43, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> writes:
>> 
>>> 
>>> If you're planning to review this series, I'd suggest waiting for my rebased
>>> version.
>>> 
>> 
>> Hello Muchun,
>
> Hi,
>
>> 
>> Thanks for taking care of powerpc side of the changes. Is it possible to
>> share your git/github tree somewhere? Sorry, but it's hard to follow
>> which series is based on which and the overall multi-series is based on
>> which upstream tree. If you could share your updated tree somewhere -
>> that would make my life simpler.
>
> Thanks. For now I'll follow David's suggestion and explicitly note which
> MM branch each series is based on. That should make things clearer early on.
>
> I'll also try to set up a tree later and share it once it's ready. Until
> then, let me know if a written summary of the branch/dependency order would
> help.
>

Written summary should be good too! Earlier I tried applying on few
trees, but I wasn't able to - hence checked for it. If you can share
which tree and/or tag/commit-id should I apply and the order of your
multi-series - that would help.

> Thanks for bearing with me while I get that sorted out.
>

Thanks a lot!

-ritesh