mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christopher Hall" <christopher.s.hall@intel.com>
To: "John Stultz" <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Stanton, Kevin B" <kevin.b.stanton@intel.com>,
	kevin.j.clarke@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:33:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <op.yc8y6lni1774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLXFVSrGD75gw7FbDtJV_cua9oowit8y=nKGS-YG5cYXAw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:26:24 -0800, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>  
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Christopher S. Hall
> <christopher.s.hall@intel.com> wrote:
>> Modern Intel hardware adds an Always Running Timer (ART) that allows the
>> network and audio device clocks to precisely cross timestamp the device
>> clock with the system clock. This allows a precise correlation of the
>> device time and system time.
>
> Thanks for your continued persistence here Christopher!  It is looking
> pretty good.
>
> I've queued these up for testing, and if that goes well, and don't hit
> anything else in review, I'll likely try to submit all but the last
> patch (unless there's an acked-by from the maintainer of that code)
> through Thomas for 4.6.

Hi John,

I just sent another patchset (v8). I corrected the comment problems  
pointed out by Richard Cochran. I also changed the arch/x86 code to use  
"non-stop" TSC rather than "invariant" TSC. They are *exactly* the same  
thing (i.e. read from the same bit of the CPUID leaf). The former exists  
already and should be used instead.  Patch 6/8 is the only patch that is  
changed apart from comments.

Thanks for your help reviewing this.

Chris

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-22 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-12 20:25 Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] time: Add cycles to nanoseconds translation Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] time: Add timekeeping snapshot code capturing system time and counter Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] time: Remove duplicated code in ktime_get_raw_and_real() Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-16  7:52   ` Richard Cochran
2016-02-16 18:23     ` Christopher Hall
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] time: Add driver cross timestamp interface for higher precision time synchronization Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-16  7:56   ` Richard Cochran
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] time: Add history to cross timestamp interface supporting slower devices Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-18 22:17   ` Richard Cochran
2016-02-19 17:33     ` John Stultz
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] x86: tsc: Always Running Timer (ART) correlated clocksource Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-18 21:11   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-23  2:38     ` Christopher Hall
2016-02-23  2:49       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] ptp: Add PTP_SYS_OFFSET_PRECISE for driver crosstimestamping Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-12 20:25 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] net: e1000e: Adds hardware supported cross timestamp on e1000e nic Christopher S. Hall
2016-02-19  0:43   ` Jeff Kirsher
2016-02-18 19:26 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Patchset enabling hardware based cross-timestamps for next gen Intel platforms John Stultz
2016-02-22 18:33   ` Christopher Hall [this message]
2016-02-22 18:49     ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=op.yc8y6lni1774gr@chall-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=christopher.s.hall@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kevin.b.stanton@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.j.clarke@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®