* [PATCH] kernel crash in powernow-k8 after lost ticks detected
@ 2006-03-20 13:43 Jan Beulich
2006-03-24 14:33 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2006-03-20 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq; +Cc: mark.langsdorf, davej, Pavel Machek, linux-kernel
Since powernowk8_cpu_init() gets called only for one of the two cores (the
other one is in the same policy set and hence cpufreq_add_dev() prevents the
call), calling other functions, namely powernowk8_get(), one CPUs that haven't
been initialized will yield a NULL from the respective powernow_data[] slot. In
the specific case, the problem occured after the system detected some lost
ticks and called cpufreq_get() for all CPUs.
While I can imagine more sophisticated fixes for this (it namely seems
questionable whether calling the init routines not on all CPUs, or, if that's
necessary, whether not properly setting up the data pointers for all affected
CPUs in powernow-k8 is okay), below simple change seems to address the
problem (the other hunk is to make a message more meaningful).
Signed-Off-By: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Index: head-2006-03-13/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- head-2006-03-13.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2006-03-13 10:21:56.000000000 +0100
+++ head-2006-03-13/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2006-03-15 08:59:42.000000000 +0100
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev (struct sys_d
if (!cpu_online(j))
continue;
- dprintk("CPU already managed, adding link\n");
+ dprintk("CPU %u already managed, adding link\n", j);
cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
cpu_sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(j);
sysfs_create_link(&cpu_sys_dev->kobj, &policy->kobj,
@@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cp
mutex_lock(&policy->lock);
- ret = cpufreq_driver->get(cpu);
+ ret = cpufreq_driver->get(policy->cpu);
if (ret && policy->cur && !(cpufreq_driver->flags & CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS)) {
/* verify no discrepancy between actual and saved value exists */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] kernel crash in powernow-k8 after lost ticks detected
2006-03-20 13:43 [PATCH] kernel crash in powernow-k8 after lost ticks detected Jan Beulich
@ 2006-03-24 14:33 ` Andi Kleen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2006-03-24 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: mark.langsdorf, davej, Pavel Machek, linux-kernel
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@novell.com> writes:
> Since powernowk8_cpu_init() gets called only for one of the two cores (the
> other one is in the same policy set and hence cpufreq_add_dev() prevents the
> call), calling other functions, namely powernowk8_get(), one CPUs that haven't
> been initialized will yield a NULL from the respective powernow_data[] slot. In
> the specific case, the problem occured after the system detected some lost
> ticks and called cpufreq_get() for all CPUs.
> While I can imagine more sophisticated fixes for this (it namely seems
> questionable whether calling the init routines not on all CPUs, or, if that's
> necessary, whether not properly setting up the data pointers for all affected
> CPUs in powernow-k8 is okay), below simple change seems to address the
> problem (the other hunk is to make a message more meaningful).
I already have a patch queued for this - also ran into it.
But I did it slightly differently by making sure powernow_data[] is valid
for all cores.
-Andi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-24 14:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-20 13:43 [PATCH] kernel crash in powernow-k8 after lost ticks detected Jan Beulich
2006-03-24 14:33 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®