[patch] i386: replace intermediate array-size definitions with ARRAY_SIZE()

[patch] i386: replace intermediate array-size definitions with ARRAY_SIZE()

[Bjorn Helgaas]

Code is easier to validate if array sizes aren't hidden behind extra
#defines.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>

Index: work-mm3/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- work-mm3.orig/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c	2006-09-26 14:33:24.000000000 -0600
+++ work-mm3/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c	2006-09-26 14:37:57.000000000 -0600
@@ -209,9 +209,6 @@
 	.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_READONLY | IORESOURCE_MEM
 } };
 
-#define ADAPTER_ROM_RESOURCES \
-	(sizeof adapter_rom_resources / sizeof adapter_rom_resources[0])
-
 static struct resource video_rom_resource = {
 	.name 	= "Video ROM",
 	.start	= 0xc0000,
@@ -273,9 +270,6 @@
 	.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUSY | IORESOURCE_IO
 } };
 
-#define STANDARD_IO_RESOURCES \
-	(sizeof standard_io_resources / sizeof standard_io_resources[0])
-
 #define romsignature(x) (*(unsigned short *)(x) == 0xaa55)
 
 static int __init romchecksum(unsigned char *rom, unsigned long length)
@@ -332,7 +326,7 @@
 	}
 
 	/* check for adapter roms on 2k boundaries */
-	for (i = 0; i < ADAPTER_ROM_RESOURCES && start < upper; start += 2048) {
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(adapter_rom_resources) && start < upper; start += 2048) {
 		rom = isa_bus_to_virt(start);
 		if (!romsignature(rom))
 			continue;
@@ -1292,7 +1286,7 @@
 	request_resource(&iomem_resource, &video_ram_resource);
 
 	/* request I/O space for devices used on all i[345]86 PCs */
-	for (i = 0; i < STANDARD_IO_RESOURCES; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(standard_io_resources); i++)
 		request_resource(&ioport_resource, &standard_io_resources[i]);
 	return 0;
 }

Re: [patch] i386: replace intermediate array-size definitions with ARRAY_SIZE()

[Andi Kleen]

Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> writes:

> Code is easier to validate if array sizes aren't hidden behind extra
> #defines.

Added thanks

I did a similar change for x86-64.

-Andi