mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* licence for LGPLed files
@ 2007-01-14 12:07 Dave Love
  2007-01-14 13:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Love @ 2007-01-14 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

There are various files (in my copy of the Ubuntu 2.6.15 source) which
have an LGPL licence, but there isn't a copy of the licence in the
distribution as there should be.  Changing them to GPL seems the best
thing to do.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: licence for LGPLed files
  2007-01-14 12:07 licence for LGPLed files Dave Love
@ 2007-01-14 13:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2007-01-14 16:43   ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2007-01-14 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Love; +Cc: linux-kernel


>There are various files (in my copy of the Ubuntu 2.6.15 source) which
>have an LGPL licence, but there isn't a copy of the licence in the
>distribution as there should be.  Changing them to GPL seems the best
>thing to do.

Changing them to GPL seems the hardest and most instrusive thing to do.


	-`J'
-- 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: licence for LGPLed files
  2007-01-14 13:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2007-01-14 16:43   ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2007-01-14 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Engelhardt; +Cc: Dave Love, linux-kernel

On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 14:32 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >There are various files (in my copy of the Ubuntu 2.6.15 source) which
> >have an LGPL licence, but there isn't a copy of the licence in the
> >distribution as there should be.  Changing them to GPL seems the best
> >thing to do.
> 
> Changing them to GPL seems the hardest and most instrusive thing to do.

well technically they don't need to be changed at all because they ARE
gpl as long as they're part of the kernel effectively (LGPL has that
"conversion to GPL" clause) ; only when used outside they are actually
lgpl....

also most of the files in question are header files where LGPL actually
makes sense when those same headers are used in userspace...

so how about not changing anything since there is no  need to change..




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-01-14 16:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-01-14 12:07 licence for LGPLed files Dave Love
2007-01-14 13:32 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-01-14 16:43   ` Arjan van de Ven

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®