mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: xiphmont@xiph.org
Cc: "Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@drzeus.cx>,
	fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
	jrb@redhat.com, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mclasen@redhat.com,
	"Lennart Poettering" <lennart@poettering.net>,
	perex@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] [PATCH] alsa: correct nonsensical sysfs device symlinks
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 19:23:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5h4pqfufs8.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <806dafc20701251007n69bc9b3cse023b51369501d42@mail.gmail.com>

At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:07:04 -0500,
xiphmont@xiph.org wrote:
> 
> On 1/25/07, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> > At Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:30:44 -0500,
> > xiphmont@xiph.org wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm working on this now and will doublecheck just in case my test was
> > > > flawed first time.
> > >
> > > Doublechecking indicates my initial test was wrong somehow; both
> > > card->dev->parent and card->parent passed as arg 2 to the
> > > device_create call in snd_register_device result in correct device
> > > symlinks. Are these two actually semantically different?  I'm just
> > > curious.
> >
> > If card->dev is created, they should be identical.
> > But, again, card->dev should be NULL on the older systems.
> >
> > > The call to device_create in cound_core.c:sound_insert_unit also needs
> > > to be modified in order for the device symlinks in the other unit
> > > types to be correct.  Again, modifying the 'dev' argument to
> > > '(dev?dev->parent:NULL)' appears to fix the problem.  Is that
> > > correct/appropriate there?
> >
> > Your change breaks the expected heavior if CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is
> > enabled.  Then devices won't belong to card* objects any more...
> 
> FWIW, CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED is enabled on all my machines-- it's
> exactly that behavior that is wrong in 2.6.20-rc5 and that I'm trying
> to fix (and testing against here/now).

Err, replace /enabled/disabled/ in my reply above.

The problem with your patch is that it breaks the structure newly
introduced.  In the new tree, card* contains the whole belonging
devices, and each device points to the one in the card object.
Passing dev->parent there cuts the relation between the card object
and each device.

That's why my patch rules out setting card->dev with ifdef
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED.  As fallback, it takes the parent device to
build the old style tree.

> Having just checked a 2.6.18 machine, none of the device symlinks
> point to card* objects; thay all point to /sys/devices/....

Yes, it's a new stuff.


Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-25 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-25  1:50 Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25  4:26 ` Greg KH
2007-01-25 14:11   ` Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25 15:15     ` Pierre Ossman
2007-01-25 15:36       ` Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25 15:40         ` Pierre Ossman
2007-01-25 15:57           ` Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25 16:54             ` [Alsa-devel] " Takashi Iwai
2007-01-25 17:03               ` Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25 17:30                 ` xiphmont
2007-01-25 17:47                   ` Takashi Iwai
2007-01-25 18:07                     ` xiphmont
2007-01-25 18:23                       ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2007-01-25 18:34                         ` xiphmont
2007-01-25 18:38                           ` Takashi Iwai
2007-01-25 18:51                             ` xiphmont
2007-01-25 19:49                               ` Greg KH
2007-01-25 20:40                                 ` xiphmont
2007-01-25 21:59                                   ` Greg KH
2007-01-26 10:53                                     ` xiphmont
2007-01-26 11:40                                       ` Takashi Iwai
2007-01-26 18:04                                         ` Greg KH
2007-01-26 18:25                                           ` Takashi Iwai
2007-01-26 18:31                                             ` xiphmont
2007-01-26 19:06                                             ` Greg KH
2007-01-26 21:58                                               ` xiphmont
2007-01-26 18:03                                     ` xiphmont
2007-01-26 18:42                                       ` Greg KH
2007-01-25 17:48                   ` Christopher "Monty" Montgomery
2007-01-25 11:27 ` Pierre Ossman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=s5h4pqfufs8.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=drzeus@drzeus.cx \
    --cc=fedora-desktop-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jrb@redhat.com \
    --cc=lennart@poettering.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mclasen@redhat.com \
    --cc=perex@suse.cz \
    --cc=xiphmont@xiph.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®