From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net>
Cc: Jeremy Katz <katzj@redhat.com>,
jordan@cosmicpenguin.net, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dsaxena@laptop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: cs5535audio: only build OLPC support if MGEODE_LX is defined
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 17:49:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <s5hbpvkdlg3.wl%tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114161035.786f89ba@ephemeral>
At Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:10:35 -0500,
Andres Salomon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:45:50 -0500
> Jeremy Katz <katzj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 10:34 -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >>>> i've zapped this patch meanwhile:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 1355c96: x86/olpc: make CONFIG_OLPC dependent on
> > > >>>> CONFIG_MGEODE_LX
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> because it cripples the ability to run distribution kernels on
> > > >>>> the OLPC.
> > > >>> OK, I reverted also all relevant changes for cs5535audio driver
> > > >>> now. The patches are saved in topic/cs5535audio branch, though.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Let's fix OLPC-geode coupling first.
> > > >> Hm, I'd really rather prefer this to be upstream. The patch I
> > > >> sent adds no regressions, allows the driver to happily coexist
> > > >> with existing stuff, and *does* add support if you configure
> > > >> OLPC with MGEODE_LX (generic kernels don't get the additional
> > > >> benefits, but those configured specifically for OLPC do).
> > > >
> > > > Yes, but the patch is also not a good way of going forward, so it
> > > > should not be in mainline.
> > >
> > > For the moment, this is a reasonable intermediate solution. I
> > > think the way forward will involve a great deal more work.
> >
> > It's the work that should have been done from the beginning. And once
> > code is upstream, the motivation to make things "correct" drops
>
> Wow. You have it so backwards, it's not even funny.
>
> When stuff is upstream, there is pressure from lots of people to make
> things "correct". When stuff isn't upstream, there's very little pressure;
> that's how the ALSA stuff has managed to sit outside of the upstream
> kernel for ages. It's a tiny bit of code, easy to port to new kernels,
> and therefore can happily be forgotten about in an out-of-tree kernel.
>
> You say "it's work that should have been done from the beginning", and
> yet this is the first time that I've heard anyone request it. If
> the geode code had remained out of mainline, I wouldn't have heard the
> request at all.
>
> I *really* don't want this to turn into OFW/promfs mess; attempts at
> mainline inclusion fail, relevant parties who we contact ignore us
> regarding the "correct" way forward, and therefore things sit outside
> of mainline for ages with no progress whatsoever.
>
>
> [...]
> > > Also, while we are at it, we should be more specific and rename the
> > > hooks from geode_ to cs5536_, since there will soon be a system in
> > > the wild with a MIPS processor and a CS5536.
> > >
> > > But needless to say, this will be a goodly amount of work and churn
> > > that will need some heavy testing in the OLPC kernel. In the
> > > meantime, Andres' fix will make the upstream kernel happier.
> >
> > It is work, but I'm not sure it's huge amounts. And by doing it
> > *upstream first*, you benefit from the feedback and testing of the
> > wider community. Development of things in a silo is what tends to
> > lead to these sorts of threads :/
> >
>
> It is huge amounts, because it's API work. If we were just twiddling
> hardware bits, that would be easy. However, we're trying to come up
> with an interface that works not only with existing upstream drivers, but
> also the remaining out-of-mainline drivers that we maintain. I also
> expressed interest in perhaps using the generic GPIO API for geode,
> but that's something that requires a good deal of thinking about. I
> don't want to rush through it just to get the ALSA driver upstream.
>
> The DCON driver has not gone upstream exactly because the GPIO API
> does not work well for it right now (and out of tree, we were banging
> on GPIO pins directly). Obviously, any changes to the API should also
> take the DCON into account; I'd rather fix this all the *right* way
> than to just write a quick patch that munges the API to make you happy,
> and then have to have even more code churn later to completely redo
> the API.
Well, the GPIO API fix is still not in clear sight, I took back
cs5535audio patches again to sound tree with the build workaround
like Andres posted (but with a proper fix of ifdef) for 2.6.29.
OLPC-dependent part won't be compiled in unless you have
CONFIG_MGEODE_LX=y, but it's still better than now.
This is really a workaround, and I hope the GPIO stuff will be
fixed in arch/x86 in a better way...
thanks,
Takashi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-10 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-11 12:23 [PATCH] x86 - Make CONFIG_OLPC dependent on CONFIG_MGEODE_LX Takashi Iwai
2008-11-11 12:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-11 13:45 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-11 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-11 13:58 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-11 14:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 4:17 ` Andres Salomon
2008-11-12 10:53 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-12 17:04 ` Andres Salomon
2008-11-12 13:54 ` Jeremy Katz
2008-11-12 14:29 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 3:44 ` Jeremy Katz
2008-11-13 6:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 15:37 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-13 15:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 16:14 ` [PATCH] ALSA: cs5535audio: only build OLPC support if MGEODE_LX is defined Andres Salomon
2008-11-13 16:31 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 17:12 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 16:38 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-13 16:42 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-13 17:01 ` Andres Salomon
2008-11-13 19:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-13 23:30 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-14 2:38 ` Andres Salomon
2008-11-14 6:54 ` Takashi Iwai
2008-11-14 7:52 ` Pavel Machek
2008-11-14 17:34 ` Jordan Crouse
2008-11-14 18:45 ` Jeremy Katz
2008-11-14 19:24 ` Jordan Crouse
2008-11-14 21:10 ` Andres Salomon
2008-12-10 16:49 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2008-12-10 18:41 ` Andres Salomon
2008-12-11 7:08 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=s5hbpvkdlg3.wl%tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=dilinger@queued.net \
--cc=dsaxena@laptop.org \
--cc=jordan.crouse@amd.com \
--cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
--cc=katzj@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®